blakley Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 I went to a portrait workshop today.... <p> <center><a href=" title="Heather by blakley, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2349/2270202629_6f48f0db5c.jpg" width="400" height="500" alt="Heather" /></a> <p> <i>M8, 50/1.4 Summilux ASPH, filter, ISO 160, DNG, studio strobes, WB: flash, 1/250@f/11, Converted and cropped in Lightroom</i></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david j.lee Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 i like it. very nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Thanks, David. Another, similar settings but with the 90/4 Macro-Elmar. <p> <center><a href=" title="Zion by blakley, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/2270183123_f3ed76e8b1.jpg" width="400" height="500" alt="Zion" /></a></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awahlster Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 On the second one I like it better with the claw like hand cropped out. First one is nice. A little softer would have been more flattering. My Canon 85mm f2.8 nFD Soft focus excels at smoothing skin on a young woman. But of course that don't work here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Re: the hand, she's roaring like a lion. Re: smoothing skin on young women, the lily does not need gilding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian bastin Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Hmm - that's the problem; the gilding is showing a bit too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 The claw is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Not sure what you're saying, Adrian, but for the record these are completely unretouched. They're not even sharpened. I converted the straight-out-of-the-camera from DNG to B&W and cropped them in Lightroom and then converted them to JPEG in Photoshop - and that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian bastin Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Sorry that was a bit cryptic. I mean that her make-up (gilding) is a bit obvious. A little softening really is essential in portraiture, if you are using lenses of this high a performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 The make-up artist did a really good job but was aiming to color-coordinate with the model's outfit, so the effect does look pretty vivid in B&W. It's of course a matter of style, but I disagree about the softening. I like my pictures of pretty girls to be sharp as a new razor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frederick_muller Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Bob, I like the shot of Heather. And I also like my portrait shots to be razor sharp ... the 50mm Lux Asph is a great portrait lens. I'm not above a bit of spotting or retouching, but I like the detail to be there in the first place. I find if I use a softer lens to start with, I lose sharpness where I really want it, in the girl's eyes. I prefer to use a razor sharp lens that picks up that detail, and then touch out any unflattering blemishes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now