rafal_m Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Hello Everybody, Just like to share a few photos from my portraiture session... and hope that the rest of you will also share too :) Rafal<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafal_m Posted April 14, 2006 Author Share Posted April 14, 2006 Rita is a retired ballet dancer and stage actress, with a great dynamic personality and ability to express herself. I hope I get a chance to work with her in the studio soon. Rafal<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc_w Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Both are nice, but I LOVE the second one! Thanks for sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amund_aaeng Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I`ll bite :-) Here`s one I shot during the recording of a music video. Used a Gowlandflex with a Rodenstock Geronar 210mm handheld . JandC Classic 400 film exposed 1/60s at f/11. A flash(old Agfatronic) provided some sidelighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amund_aaeng Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 One more. Same camera, Tri-X 320, natural light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcoda Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Father John, 1983, Berkeley, CA My own scan... I have to get this drum scanned... the silver contact print is beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_m Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I'm afraid I don't like either of those shots. Both look obviously over-posed and I found them somewhat pretentious. But then I prefer a more natural look. I don't see the point of the first shot, someone staring at a piece of fabric? I just don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhneely Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Bergger 200, souped in Rodinal. Calumet student monorail, 210mm lens (don't remember the manufacturer).<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhneely Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 same session<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monophoto Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Here's a image of Jojo Chatterjee - Zone VI, 210mm Caltar, Arista 400, available light Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fowler Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 5X7 Eastman #2, 10" B&L Petzval, J&C Classic 200<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertfarnham Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 ...since we're sharing...these aren't all "portraits", but they're in there. <BR><BR> 4x5: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=487366<BR><BR> 8x10: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=541685<BR><BR> Robert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amund_aaeng Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Very nice work Robert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafal_m Posted April 15, 2006 Author Share Posted April 15, 2006 Very nice work everybody. :) I'm finding myself using the 4x5 a lot more then anything else... unless I'm out in the field (with a medium format). Next weekend I'll be doing some still-life work, so I'll be posting that shortly afterwards. Hopefully with our contribution to these LF presentations, we can get others to contribute and maybe even have more photographers trying LF. ;) See you all in a week or two with some more photos... if not sooner. Rafal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin_cozine Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Kinda below the waist portrait<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jocksturges Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 You're running your camera very competently but concentrating on it so much that you are not giving as much thought to the quality and nature of your light and ground as you might. All are equally important. There are three catagories of ground in photography. Cat 1. -- the ground is a bad distraction for one reason or another and harms the photograph, Cat.2 The ground is just there. Blah. Cat 3. the ground proffers/frames/offers up the subject like a jewel in a setting. With the exception of the second retired dance teacher image which has an August Sander or Disfarmer like feel to it, all the grounds in your images are cat. 2. Cat. 3 is the holy grail. Look at Sally Mann's work for an illustration of brilliant figure/ground work. As to light, you might profit from attending to Edward Weston's work as well as that of early Ansel Adams. Look at their pictures ONLY in terms of how they used light to achieve their portraits... I don't mean to annoy with these suggestions -- your camera work really is very good. But the disconnect between that and the ground and light issues seemed singularly surprising to me so I stuck an oar in. I am presumptious in my conceits I am sure so please feel free to suggest that I go soak my head... j sturges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_galli4 Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 An old favorite done with 15" Bausch & Lomb Petzval on 5X7. <center><img src="http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com/Bokeh/MasonCaedonPetzval052905Small.jpg"><br><i><b>Caedon & Mason</b></i></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now