Jump to content

Using Nikon G Lenses on a Canon 450D


mike_halliwell

Recommended Posts

I found (Ahem...bought :D) a mono converted Canon 450D and have no Canon lenses...;)

 

My Nikon lens collection goes from pre AI > E.

 

I'm mainly planning on full manual, but am aware i need to manually move the aperture on G lenses.

 

Anyone had much experience with what's available, adapter wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're all the same, really, and the caveats and user reports don't vary much.

 

In a nutshell, its a crummy kluge that nobody really enjoys using unless their back is to a wall. You get an external lever that moves the internal G lens aperture lever up and down to roughly set the aperture, but no real indication of what exact aperture you are setting and no reliable repeatability. It works to the extent you can stop-down meter and set the correct exposure, but isn't ideal for situations where you want to quickly dial in a specific repeatable manual aperture (i.e., for video).

 

The gimmick works a bit better with mirrorless cameras, because the adapter is thick enough to include a semblance of an actual aperture ring which you can experiment with and mark to match a favorite G lens. The EF adapter is hair thin, so you're forced to fly blind other than using AE or manual TTL metering. If that is OK for your type of work, then it won't bother you. But most "Nikkor-Lens--On-Canon-DSLR" enthusiasts try to avoid the G lenses in favor of AFD, AI and pre-AI with proper aperture rings: the G is more trouble than its worth except in rare cases of super-great Gs like the 14-24 (and even then- ugh).

 

AFAIK, the G "E" lenses with electronic motorized internal aperture mechanisms (ironically a full-on knockoff of Canon EF) are not fully adaptable to some other mounts like Canon DSLR, as the adapter is too thin to house the electronics and controls required to set an aperture. And Nikon is a lot more rigid and territorial about its current electronic interface protocols than it is regarding the sixty year old mechanical lever.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the older lenses with full manual control of focus and aperture, the inexpensive Nikon to EOS and Nikon to FD adapters work just fine, if you don't mind stop-down manual use. I use many of my pre-AI and early AI lenses on my Canon digital (and sometimes film) cameras. Lenses like my mirror lenses and my PC-Nikkor are manual anyhow.

 

For the others, "more trouble than its worth" is pretty much it so far as I am concerned. There is nothing that Nikon offers me (for my particular tasks) otherwise that seems to justify the extra difficulties.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only used a G adapter on a MILC. As has been said, there's no real indication of what aperture has been set. Wide-open and fully stopped down are obviously easy options, but the middle apertures could be f/4, 4.5 or 5.6, etc. with no easy way of knowing. Unless you can monitor the exposure.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is just to start using that 450D , there are plenty EF mount l50mm lenses at flesbay at the price of an adapter, no hastling with adapters just native EF mount lenses..

 

Alternatively, have a glance at the youngnuo 50mm for canon ataround $60 ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main use of the camera will be Multi-Spectral Imaging of paintings and documents. Often the signals are pretty weak so I'd like to use a fast lens. I'd planned to use one of my Sigma Arts's but they're all G lenses.

 

I've found a very inexpensive adapter that has a little lever to shut the aperture down on G lenses, worth a try. The actual aperture value isn't too important, but repeat-ability is. Hopefully there's a way to make a notch or a pre-set mark. Focus was always going to be manual with zoomed in LV at the taking wavelength.

 

If it works well, I might be able to persuade my boss to buy a converted mono FX body.... in Nikon mount!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alternatively, have a glance at the youngnuo 50mm for canon ataround $60 ...

Why would you do that? When Canon's own 'plastic fantastic' original costs not much more.

 

In a head-to-head (on the same camera) against Nikon's cheap 50mm f/1.8 AF lens, the Canon was noticeably better wide open and down to f/2.8. Beyond that, there was almost no difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you do that? When Canon's own 'plastic fantastic' original costs not much more.

 

Just an option, over here the canon is just over 120 euro's the yongnuo under 60 eiro's , so just fr an experiment it would save around 50%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...