Jump to content

Un-scientific test


darklights

Recommended Posts

My daughter bought me an early Christmas present last night, and

couldn't wait for me to test it out (isn't it usually the person

recieving that this happens with?).

 

This is a very un-scientific review:

 

The following image is a 100% crop of an 7" x 8" flag marker. I

measured the distance to the flag from where I stood, 150 feet

exactly. I used ISO 400, TV 400, AV 7.1, at a focal length of 300mm

using a Canon 75-300 IS usm and a Quantaray (sold by Ritz) 2x TC on a

300D.

 

I have to add this...IS function worked very well with this TC, which

surprised me. In sunlight AF works O.k, even at AV of 7.1 which is

what I had it set at(add the two stops due to TC on top of that).

 

Over all, for a very low cost TC that is consumer grade I'd say this

TC worked beyond its' 79 USD cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, this is a little embarassing, but after Phils' comment I checked a few things out. I had to re-setup my computer last week and forgot something real important. I forgot to re-calibrate my monitor! And Phil is right...it IS wayyyy underexposed. I could hardly see the darn thing after. As to the sharpness issue, there are probably a few extenuating circumstances there. Such as: the TC seems to have added more noise (dunno how though) to the 400ISO, and the fact that I just flat out need glasses :-) My kids not to hip on me posting her picture but here's one that seems sharper to my failing eyes, using the same setup (caught her rolling on the ground with the pups).<div>00APfr-20869084.jpg.e84c6cd16a3c3f535dba14ccd5d8752c.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...