Hi all, There has been much discussed on comparing and contrasting the D300s/D700 and D7000 in recent threads and I've read most of them, but how about a more dated question in comparing these to the D200 (I know, many more updates since then so seems *some* upgrade is warranted). I've used a D200 primarily since it was new and am contemplating getting a new body in time for an upcoming trip. I have a trip coming up where I'll be doing mostly landscape shots, a lot of dawn/dusk work as usual, rainforest photos and possibly night sky photos if the weather cooperates. I won't be doing much wildlife at all this time so I am leaving my telephotos at home. I also am aware of the aging design of the D300s/D700 and that both will likely be replaced in 2011. The D7000 appears to be the most updated but seems more of a consumer update to the D90 and seems less robust relative to even the D200. I am concerned it may not withstand being bounced around in a pack all day or deal well with a wet environment like I've put my D200 through. It also doesn't use compact flash which is a bit annoying as that's all I have, so would have to buy all new cards if I were to go that route. My question is: it worth getting a new body now? Is there enough material improvements over the D200 to justify it (in any of the three bodies above)? Thoughts/Suggestions?