Jump to content

This is not a test! I repeat: This is not a test!


Miha

Recommended Posts

I am just comparing some lenses and TCs that came to my hand one afternoon.

It is interesting to compare an old 400 f/3,5 with the 70-200VR +TC20E (at the

same focal length =400mm) to se what a TC does compromising image quality.

Even abusing the whole thing (stacking two TCs together) the 400 mm prime

still does it better.

You can make your conclusions for yourselves.

Regards, Miha.<div>00LKa8-36757684.jpg.095047f4aadcadd653b4e923aae3dd21.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this is enough - make your own conclusions. I can not judge what level of quality is enough for you so you must decide it yourselves.

I made this practical comparison with Nikon D200, set on ISO 100, aperture priority, all photos shot with the lens wide open.

Hope you had some fun looking at this post.

Regards, Miha.<div>00LKbq-36760484.jpg.410f7f71ea330d36a8254caa47a6277c.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice series. Actually, what impresses me is that until you get to the last few photos with the wildly "stacked" teleconverters, the differences in quality would not matter all that much to me in "real world" situations, save perhaps if I were photographing a small bird at a great distance (for example). Slight losses in contrast, as for example in the Sigma photos, could largely (completely?) be remedied in PS. It's even more impressive that the photos were taken with a wide-open aperture. Sometimes people get overly concerned, I think, about very tiny differences in resolution/contrast.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all pretty interesting and the sharpness on the 400 is pretty amazing. But if you don't mind me saying, you are comparing apples and oranges here: you have a fixed length, prime telephoto, compared to a telezoom with a 3X magnification. It is obvious that a telezoom will have to make some compromises. Also, I think you should have also tried stopping down to say f8 or f11 to get a betteridea on how they stack up against each other. Just my 2 cents...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago I did my own comparison between a Nikon VR 80-400 ED AF IF zoom which I had recently acquired for use on my D100, and an old (manual focus, manual diaphragm) Leitz 400 f5.6 Telyt. They were pretty close, but in the end I sold the Nikon and kept the Telyt due to my perception of sharper, slightly contrastier, images with the older lens. I wouldn't hold my comparison up to scientific scrutiny, but it helped me pare down the lenses to what worked best for my uses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did some similar testing with my d200 and my 70-200 2.8 and my 300mm AF f4. My conclusion was basically the same as yours - you are better off (usually) just cropping the picture from the lens shot without the TC.

 

I just ordered the 80-400 and will save my pennies, lots and lots of them, for a 500mm or 600mm somewhere down the road.

 

Great job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...