graham_wootton Posted January 24, 2002 Share Posted January 24, 2002 Does anyone know the precise physical explanation for the "starburst" effect you get when shooting into the sun (or other very bright light source) at small apertures? The effect is definitely related to the diaphragm blades as the points of the star are always equal to or a multiple of the number of blades. I believe it is due to diffraction but cannot envisage how the spread of light becomes so wide. Some writers have attributed the effect to reflection off the edges of the diaphragm blades but I cannot envisage how that would work either. Any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott bacon Posted January 24, 2002 Share Posted January 24, 2002 I believe the "starburst" effect is created by an interference pattern due to diffraction. The light coming into the lens diffracts off the edge of the shutter leaves. Amplitudes of diffracted light which are in phase add together and show up as the bright spokes of the starburst. Amplitudes of diffracted light which are out of phase cancel each other out and this creates the space between the spokes of the starburst. It has been a while since my college physics curriculum, so maybe someone better or more recently educated can provide a more precise answer. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_tsow Posted January 24, 2002 Share Posted January 24, 2002 I believe this effect is a result of light passing through the film and reflecting off of the back plate of the camera. The diaphragm blades could credibly determine the number of spokes. I think the "anti-halation" layer of film is intended to minimize this effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vijay_nebhrajani Posted January 24, 2002 Share Posted January 24, 2002 It does not only have to be diaphragm blades - consider: when you clean your lens in the much advertised "circular" motion, you may leave very fine (for lack of a better word) streaks. These "streaks" would act like a "starburst" filter. Eyeglass wearers whose lenses are not absolutely clean will be familiar with the effect. I think that anything that causes diffraction will cause the starburst effect - this includes dust particles, diaphragm blades, shutter blades (leaf shutters), cleaning streaks, glass imperfections etc. But yes, it is caused because of interference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_piper Posted January 24, 2002 Share Posted January 24, 2002 Folks describing interference at edge of aperture are right, Light spreads out (diffracts) perpendicular to the edges of the blades, with star spikes at right angles to flat/straight edges of the aperture opening. So (if you really care) a 5-blade iris will give a 10-point sun star, a symmetical 6 blade iris a 6-point star (because opposite edges are parallel, their points overlap), 7-blade iris a 14-point star, etc...And this effect may be less pronounced/more diffuse with rounded iris touted on some newer lenses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sd_sad Posted December 10, 2003 Share Posted December 10, 2003 Yes yes... very interesting indeed! However i must say you all forgot to mention the appenditure recoliation affect... Very minute in its ways as a simple foliation synthesis but still it is the more present affect of the statbust. I suggest to fix this you simply attach an EGM-Spec9 focus scope to your camera and it will reprecate all the problems for you ... your welcome :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_deldado Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 <p>So, for those of us trying to avoid this phenomenon; it's caused by the leaves of the shutter and not the leaves of the aperture, correct? Meaning that a focal plane shutter camera will not have starbursts and a 5 bladed leaf shutter, for example will, yes?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 <p>Not correct. It's a result of the small aperture. Images taken with a focal plane shutter commonly show this effect.</p> <p>A question this thread made me think of-- what happens when you have a completely circular stop instead of a bladed iris diaphragm? I guess it would be what Jay Piper said-- a diffuse glow around the highlights, because the circular aperture is like an infinite number of (infinitely small) aperture blades. This would only come up with really old lenses with Waterhouse stops, or certain process lenses, but it's an interesting 'thought experiment'.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 <blockquote> <p>This would only come up with really old lenses with Waterhouse stops, or certain process lenses, but it's an interesting 'thought experiment'.</p> </blockquote> <p>Or with just about any lens used wide open.<br> ;-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 <p><em>Or with just about any lens used wide open.</em><br> <em> </em><br> But the 'starbust' effect this thread is only visible at small apertures, due to diffraction. Am I missing something?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_deldado Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <blockquote>Not correct. It's a result of the small aperture. Images taken with a focal plane shutter commonly show this effect.</blockquote> <p>This is true with focal plane shutter cameras at small apertures, but not large ones. However, it happens to me at all apertures, not just the small ones, with my Hasselblad leaf shutter lens.<br /><a href="../medium-format-photography-forum/00XEIt">http://www.photo.net/medium-format-photography-forum/00XEIt</a> <br /><br />Therefore my assumption is, I need a focal plane shutter camera with a large aperture to avoid this effect, correct?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <blockquote> <p>But the 'starbust' effect this thread is only visible at small apertures, due to diffraction. Am I missing something?</p> </blockquote> <p> A combination of the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>a diffuse glow around the highlights, because the circular aperture is like an infinite number of (infinitely small) aperture blades. This would only come up with really old lenses with Waterhouse stops,</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Or with just about any lens used wide open.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p> it happens to me at all apertures, not just the small ones,</p> </blockquote> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now