sven_felsby Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120204/01440917661/photographer-appeals-ruling-saying-its-not-infringement-to-have-vaguely-similar-photos.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120204/01440917661/photographer-appeals-ruling-saying-its-not-infringement-to-have-vaguely-similar-photos.shtml</a><br> To quote "The Whole Nine Yards":<br> "It would be sad if it weren´t so pathetic".</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmarchant Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>Stupid people can sue you for anything. I sincerely doubt that the appeals court will do more than laugh at this idiot.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allenahale Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>What does this say about all the lawyers that seem to line up to represent these stupid people in their lawsuits? Ohh, I forgot the lawyers always win ... they get paid no matter what and get paid even more with appeals.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denniswms Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>The woman never had a case- not based on these images.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbollinger Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 <p>Either the Plaintiff's lawyer is a fool or he is getting paid by the hour........</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now