ramon_v__california_ Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 has anybody used or is using the sigma 18-50mm f/2.8? i'd like to try it on the street. my walk-around is a D70 with the kit lens and the 50mm f/1.8 in one of my vest pockets. the only other fast lens i have is the 17-55mm f/2.8 and i use it only for events and other controlled situations. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_ferron1 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Ramon it sounds like you'll just end up duplicating what you have already. Often I'll just leave a 20mm prime on the camera for a walk around lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramon_v__california_ Posted May 2, 2006 Author Share Posted May 2, 2006 good point taken, michael. thanks. a friend of mine actually wants to buy my kit lens for his D50. i told him if i can find a replacement, he can have it. in my film days, i carry three primes when i'm on the street. my F2AS when i'm in the mood for manual and the F80 when i'm a little lazy and wants AF. i didn't mind swapping lenses at all. with digital, i'm overprotective, maybe, with my toys from dust since i'm always in the san francisco and monterey/carmel areas where it's always windy. hence, the wont to short wide-zoom. am thinking also that the f/3.5 of the kit lens to the constant f/2.8 of the sigma might make me happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron_lee___minneapolis__m Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 I had that lens on my Canon body. It was great, and very sharp. Just slightly less sharp than the Canon 24-105L. I'm sure it won't hold a candle to the 17-55. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelschrag Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Hmmm..I have the 17-55mm lens and it is excellent and a great walk around lens. Maybe your looking for something that is not as heavy? Or you don't want to put too much wear 'n tear on the 17-55? Whatever the case, have you looked at the Sigam 18-50mm photozone review? Looks like the CAs can be high and its a bit soft on the edges at 18mm. http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/sigma_1850_28/index.htm Klaus (photozone) will be testing the 17-55 Nikon soon. It will be interesting to see the results that he obtains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramon_v__california_ Posted May 3, 2006 Author Share Posted May 3, 2006 thanks for the input, michael s. yes, trying to get away from the weight of the 17-55mm. i only use it for events.... thanks also for the link. i was able to test the 18-50mm. the 18-70mm is better for me --- performance and cosmetics. thanks for the idea, michael f. i'll probably pack a 20mm prime together with the 50mm for a really lightweight walk-araound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Sigma have also started making a 17-70mm f/2.8 - f4.5 DC Macro. This may be better for you as a 'casual' lens than the Nikon 18-70mm. Slightly wider and faster and focussing down to 7.9 inches. http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3315&navigator=6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Also you could supplement it with a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM for when you really need the faster speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now