edward_h Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 <p>Here be a review of the three lenses, mostly focusing on the 18-50.</p> <p><ahref="http://mindreantre.se/index.php?page=html-review-sigma_18-50_vs_canon_16-35_vs_canon_50">http://mindreantre.se/index.php?page=html-review-sigma_18-50_vs_canon_16-35_vs_canon_50</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimstrutz Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 Thanks, Edward. I don't have the 16-35, but your comparison to the 50mm f/1.8 is about the same as what I got. I like the lens. It's not perfect, but it quite decent for an f/2.8 zoom priced under $500. I use it mostly for weddings and find that edge sharpness is not usually critical for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheldonnalos Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 Thanks! The effort is appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant g Posted May 14, 2005 Share Posted May 14, 2005 Thank you...that was a very practical evaluation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now