melissa_eiselein Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Has anyone seen the new Bogen/Manfrotto Magfiber carbon fiber tripods in person? The Magfiber Pro models are a pound heavier than 3443 model. The non pro Magfiber model is the same weight as the 3443, but it won't go as tall. Both the Magfiber models, however, have a very low to the ground minimum height. Now I'm confused. Do I want to look for a used 3443/3444 model while they are still in stock at B&H? (According to the Bogen site, these new Magfiber models are replacing them) or Do I want to pay less and get a shorter Magfiber that is rated for 8 pounds instead of 13? I'm using a 10D and, currently, my longest, heaviest lens is probably the 70-200 f/4 so the 8 pound rating shouldn't be a problem. Also, I'm 64 inches tall, so it probably won't be that big of a deal to lean over a bit or raise the brace as high as it will go. I want three things out of a carbon fiber tripod. I want it to be very light, durable and have a lateral arm for straight-down shooting. Do I have other choices besides Bogen--which, btw, I've always been happy with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eosdoc Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 I have been very happy with my Manfrotto 441 (Bogen 3443). Although I wish it could go lower, I have never lost a shot because of this limitation. In <a href= http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=004W8k >direct answer</a> to your last question, there is one other choice of carbon fiber tripod with a lateral arm: Gitzo, a company which, like Bogen and Manfrotto, is owned by the Vitec group of companies. <P> Gitzo has an Explorer series in CF and Aluminium. They also sell accessory lateral arms that attach to "normal" tripods, such as their Mountaineer Carbon Fibre models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melissa_eiselein Posted November 22, 2004 Author Share Posted November 22, 2004 Thanks, Julian. I'll take a look at the Gitzo to compare cost and weight. Because I'm over-the-hill and outta-shape my biggest concern is weight and portability. The new Magfiber tripods weigh about the same as my 3011, so it would be a waste to pay $300 for a no-pound difference. You might want to check out the new Magfibers if you thinking lower might be beneficial. They can get 4" from the ground instead of 12" as with the 3443. If it will suit your purpose, you might be able to sell your 3443 and get enough to buy the Magfiber. Then again, if you are tall, you might find that it doesn't reach high enough even with the center column boosted all the way up. Decisions, decisions, decisions. I clicked on the link in your post and couldn't figure out what you were alluding to. Surely, you're not still stewing about a post I left almost two years ago, are you? Heck, even I don't hold grudges that long and I thought I was the Queen of Grudges! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eosdoc Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Yes, I am tall (5'11"), so I like the height the 441 gives me. And no, not a grudge. It just meant that I had to re-read my post to make sure that there was no possibility of misinterpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now