joy_blackburn Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 I'm a teacher and I need to go back to school for a Master's Degree. I don't want to get a traditional education Masters. Since I teach Yearbook and Graphic Design and have a small photography business, I thought it would help me both personally and professionally to get an MFA in photography. Since I teach full time and don't live near any major university with a photography masters program, I have been looking around to see what online programs are out there. I found that Savannah College of Art and Design had one, and I have applied and been accepted. Before I commite myself to the program, I wondered if anyone had heard anything about the school or the program. I have seen some not so great things floating around about the school, buth they've all been pretty general from blogs and things. I'm wondering about the schools reputation...is it good? Is this program worthwhile? Any help anyone has would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_hall2 Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Your question deserves a full essay. First, Savannah is a good school. To learn how its photographers are doing, write to the school and ask where the students are placed. Visit and talk to the students. If you want a useful degree, digital media and graphics design are two fields that are flourishing. UMass Dartmouth has a superb program and is inexpensive. It is four years, maybe five for a double major. Remember an MFA means "Fine Arts," a field rarely leading to practical work. To improve photography skills go to PPA (prof.photog.of America) one-week "schools" througout the US. It takes about 10 years of daily experience to become a good portrait photographer, and the competition is stiff, and getting harder. Weddings will "always" be there; the WPPI group is specialized for that field. Yearbooks are mostly photojournalism, not fine arts. I am not a big fan of learning photography in a college setting (but a huge fan of college education). If I were to recommend one thing, I would recommend the graphic arts field as one that will grow. I think you could learn much of that on your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 "To improve photography skills go to PPA (prof.photog.of America) one-week "schools" througout the US. " That is a fine answer Robert, but it isn't completely relevant to Joy's problem. For many teachers having a master 's degree is needed to be able to move up in pay grade or to qualify for better positions. I can't comment on SCAD directly as I sometimes teach at a rival school in Atlanta ( Portfolio Center -- but it doesn't have a master's program ) and anything I might say could be construed as disinformation. Having made that disclaimer: - It is always a good idea to read and research as much you can but keep in mind that those who are dissatisfied are far more likely to vent than those who are happy. - As to whether any career oriented school's offerings are worthwhile, that has to be answered on an individual basis; are they offering courses that are explicitly relevent to the way in which you want to grow your business or career? Personally I'd recommend an MBA over an MFA program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_kobeck1 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 If the goal is to teach Fine Art, painting sculpture or photography in a university or college, then an MFA is relative and required. Actually, the arts is probably the ONLY major one can teach full time in a tenure position as a "professor of photography" with an MFA. There is no Phd for studio arts. I am doing my MFA online at Academy of Art University. When you graduate from SCAD no one will ever know if it was the online version or the in class one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_chadwick Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 Joy- Do you realize that the SCAD program is a MA in photography, NOT an MFA. Is your final goal to teach at the college level? Most college's want an MFA. I'm not saying that there are not colleges that will accept an MA- there most definately are but a MFA is more flexible. I know lots about the program - I am a member of the first graduating class and was the first student accepted into the program. If you would like to email me at jchad@frontiernet.net I'd be happy to answer any questions you have. -Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobmichaels Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Ellis suggested: "Personally I'd recommend an MBA over an MFA program." Let me second that suggestion if earnings are any factor in your decision. Now if you just love photography and want some formal education to enhance your skill, go for it and don't worry about any degree. But if you want to make more money in a photography business, a degree in business is the way to go. Or, you may find there are simply many ways to make more money and much easier in a non photographic field so that you can enjoy photography free from economic constraints. Almost all of us know someone who makes a pretty good living in the photography business without being a very skilled photographer but by being a good marketer and business person. And, conversely, some excellent photographers who struggle just to get by because they are poor business people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poplo Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 <p>Hi there.<br> I was reading the reviews and i find them very helpful as well. I was just wondering if anyone understand what are the 45 hours for, under the courses' description. It seems to me that its not much. Since it cant be 45 hours a week, then what do they stand for. Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poplo Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 <p>Hi there.<br> I was reading the reviews and i find them very helpful as well. I was just wondering if anyone understand what are the 45 hours for, under the courses' description. It seems to me that its not much. Since it cant be 45 hours a week, then what do they stand for. Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_chadwick Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 <p>It refers to contact hours. Each class is 5 contact hours or credits. There are a total of 9 classes you must take for a total of 45 credits or contact hours. You will spend far more than 5 hours a week outside of class doing your assignments and research etc.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus_knoll Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 <p>A low-residency MFA program like the one at <a href="http://www.transart.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Transart Institute</a> might be an alternative to online as it combines personal contact with individual study. Wikipedia has an extensive list. Vermont College and the Milton Avery Grad School might also be of interest. Best of luck in your search. Klaus</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now