gurney_tim Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>This: http://picasaweb.google.com/timothygurney/Rollei#<br> Is my Rolleiflex 2.8F white face (late) that has never been used, original box, strap, instructions (german), lens cap.<br> If you feel that this is of interest to do hesitate to contact me email timothygurney-at-gmail.com (-at- = @)</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>I wish I had spare cash! I occassionaly regret selling my Rolleiflex T but the fund went to a Hasselblad system, which is far more suitable for me.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debusti_paolo Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>I wish I have some € for it!!It's a beauty. Buon Natale</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fwstutterheim Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>A real object of desire:<br> - White face<br> - 2.8 Xenotar<br> - 12/24 frames </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>Sandy Ritz at Collectible Cameras has one for sale on his website for $1,595 -- in 9+condition. I had one for awhile: the 2.8 Xenotar is a great lens. Here's a sample --</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_purdy Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 <p>Would it make a difference if I said I have seen that camera twice on ebay. Same serial number. For sale from the US in july 2005 and for sale from Poland in November 2007. I love that type camera so much since I got one that I have kept track of the ones for sale there. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 <p>They say that the sharpest Rollei is the 3.5F Planar with the last lens element configuration.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aplumpton Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 <p>I ended up buying a mint Monolta Autocord (needed multiple exposure), as mint Rolleiflexes are so expensive. The quality of course is not quite the same, but it is better to have one in use in my case than one only imagined. Your beautiful camera will probably continue as a collector's camera and not as a user. Worhwhile I guess for a keen collector, but also a little bit of a pity. Don't forget to exercise the shutter over its full range every few months, or it will need life support, as did my once collector M4-P was when I bought it a year ago from an estate sale.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pensacolaphoto Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 <p>What a beauty it is, but not for me. I go for user quality cameras so they can be used without the fear of having the camera lose value as with a mint cameralike the one here.<br> I have a beaten up 3.5F Planar that jusr recently was finally repaired after I had it stored as broken for many years. It arrived to me broken from a not-so-trthful ebay seller. I need to compare the sharpness of the lens with the 2.8 Planar in my user quality 2.8D. If it is any better than the lens in the 2.8D, it would be amazing indeed.</p> <p>I used to own a 2.8E and 2.8F that looked too pretty, so I sold them.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now