martin_shock3 Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 For those who have enquired about GX100's image quality at higher ISO settings compared to GRD; from the link blow you can see a very clear side-by-side comparison. The images from the GX100 seem, by far, cleaner through out the range. Judge for yourself. http://ricoh.grfan.net/showthread.php?p=5476 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 It's certainly a big improvement, and apart from pronounced barrel distortion at shorter focal lengths, the lens seems sharp with fairly good PF performance, and the benefit of starting at a genuine wide angle. However, for high ISO work I'd still prefer a Fuji F series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin_shock3 Posted May 13, 2007 Author Share Posted May 13, 2007 Really, the Fuji better than this, awesome, have you got any pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf31fd/page17.asp "we've compared the F31fd to a whole range of much more expensive compacts going right up to 10MP, and - aside from a little extra resolution at base ISO - it puts most of them to shame. Once you get to ISO 400 there simply isn't a compact on the market that can hold a flame to it." ISO comparison tests can be found earlier in the review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin_shock3 Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 looks good but wide starts at 36m as compared 24m on the GX100 with the addition of image stabilisation. I could on but apart from the possible superior ISO, and lets face it we are talking at the highend here, the F31d doesn't have much more to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 I used the F30 for about a week and gave it to my wife. The complete lack of image control made it entirely useless to me. It's a nice point and shoot but not that valuable for anything else. FWIW, I ended up with a GR Digital. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacob_brown Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 You'll find noise in both cameras at all ISOs. If you don't mind noise it seems to be a capable camera. Apparently some speeds are only accessible from manual mode too. Here is an interesting comparison I found -- GX100 vs. Canon 5D: http://www.flickr.com/photos/brandonshigeta/sets/72157600169335133/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansky Posted June 11, 2007 Share Posted June 11, 2007 Interestingly, in this day and age of the "Big players" removing Raw capability from their compacts, there is more of a demand from Pro photographers looking for a high quality Compact that offers, solid build quality, manual setting and aperture priority, manual focus override and Raw capability in fact, most of the features found on a good quality DSLR. There are currently very few manufacturers who appreciate or even care about these needs, one does listen because they build very high quality manual cameras and now a Digital rangefinder, and Ricoh is one of the others who is a leader rather than follower when it comes to digital compact innovation. For a few years now, many Pro's have wanted a small compact backup digital with Raw, manual and aperture priority, good and usable ISO range, no shutter lag, and short end zoom lens for wide angle coverage of groups and a long end for portraits all in an inconspicuous body that was tough and "Does the job". For a long time this need has not been met and many (including myself) carry a Ricoh GRD (I always carried an analogue Ricoh GR1s when working overseas as a Photojournalist). After 2 yrs using a GRD with what I consider to be good results (see some of my images : http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=632920) Ricoh has unleashed the GX100 - not a GRD replacement, but similar in many ways and meeting a requirement asked for by many jobbing photographers for a long time. Ok, it is not and never will equate to DSLR image quality but, it is a very usable camera that matches in many ways the quality of analogue film and some I know (Mitch Alland - another GRD afficionado, has produced 40x60 inch prints from GRD images. I am sure this camera will find it's way (as it already has) into many photographers pockets, bags etc to be used as a back up or even in lieue of the heavy DSLR and lenses. It offers all the things asked for and produces images that appear even cleaner than those from the GRD! Something to think about, and if you look at some of the GX100 images taken in Raw - they are superb (Paulo Bizarro to name but one - he has just captured some superb images of fish markets and aftermath of the storms in Oman - http://paulobizarro.com/tema.asp?id=39) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now