david_killick Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 I have read on several sites about radioactive Leitz lenses. Seems the "rare earth element" lanthanum used in lenses made in the early 50s, such as my Summicron, is radioactive. There's possibly thorium too. Should I worry? Is this the reason these lenses always get such "glowing" reviews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralph_barker Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 I've never worried about it. In fact, the third eye is quite convenient when using a shoe-mounted auxiliary viewfinder. ;-) Seriously, I've not seen readings of the actual radiation levels, if any, actually associated with such "rare earth element" lenses. Another urban myth perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art waldschmidt Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Ralph, Love the comment!! - still laughing!I've got an old 55mm Olympus Zuiko f/1.2 - pretty certain that its one of the optics in question!! I've never noticed any changes (minute differences in density, fogging) in 400 speed film, whether the lens is stored in close proximity, over a period of time, or not. I imagine any radioactivity must be very minimal - by the way, I've noticed an increase in night vision capability with the new eye!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterg Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Just don't swallow the darn thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dale_griffith Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Shutterbug ran an article on radioactive lenses from the 50's and 60's with rare earth elements a few years ago. I don't remember the year or month. The list wan't comprehensive and I don't recall which if any Leica lenses were included. Their opinion was that you could sleep with a box of these lenses under your bed without measurably increasing your health risk. To demonstrate the radiation levels, they placed several lenses front element down on sheet film for several WEEKS. This film showed round patches of fogging to various degrees where the lenses were placed. Keep in mind that the lens elements were much closer to the film than they would be in a camera and the exposure was over several weeks time. For normal use on a camera the radiactivity will have NO effect on the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 <a href="http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/radioactive.html">Radioactive Glass in LensesAre Your Lenses Really "Hot"?!! by Robert Monaghan</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_killick Posted June 22, 2002 Author Share Posted June 22, 2002 Better night vision sounds good. Now I see how they developed "Leica lenses with eyes" for the M3. And the famous "Leica glow". Sounds like it's not too much of a worry, but always good to find out more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_killick Posted June 22, 2002 Author Share Posted June 22, 2002 And thanks to Kelly for the link. Lots of comments and info, but the jury seems to be out on whether or not radiocative lenses are a concern: "Just how radioactive are typical "hot" lenses? Studies of a half dozen Leica lenses (see postings below) came up with 1.5 milliroentgens/hr. This figure compares to 20 milliroentgens (mrem) per day maximum permissible dosage in many western countries. But that 20 mrem is for whole body exposure, while the lenses mostly emit shorter range beta and alpha particles. On the other hand, it may take just a single gamma ray to turn one of your cells into a cancerous cell and cause a tumor. These 1.5 mrem/hr levels are surprisingly high compared to typical levels for radiation sources used in scientific and civil defense training (often 2 or 3 orders of magnitude lower levels). Don't tell OSHA or the EPA, or all those collectible Leica lenses may end up in a secret government landfill! " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Dear Leica forum members. It has come to the attention of the Atomic Energy Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency that several of you are in possession of the above mentioned "Leica" lenses. These lenses violate minimum safety standards for radiation emission as specified by law. Under the right of eminent domain, and said law, please surrender immediately all such lenses in your possession to the appropriate representative of the United States Department of Energy. Further details may be obtained by contacting said representative at the following email address. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 <IMG SRC="http://www.ezshots.com/members/tripods/images/tripods-237.gif"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted June 23, 2002 Share Posted June 23, 2002 Kelly, you're a genius! ROTFLOL!! :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now