bill_meyer Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 I have just recently shot Portra 400BW and Ilford XP2 Super. I changed the ISO setting in my camera from 400 to 800 (pushing it 1 stop). I am curious if the film can still be processed normally or if I should ask my lab to push process it by 1 stop? What advantages/disadvantages are there for either processing, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vedearduff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Bill, The information sheet for XP2 Super indicates that the film should be processed normally when rated anywhere from EI 100 to EI 800. Based upon that, you should use normal processing for the XP2 Super. I suspect that the same holds true for the Portra. If the rolls is question hold anything of importance, shoot one roll of each rated at EI 800 and have the test rolls processed normally. If the results are as expected, use normal processing. If not, use push processing. If you do the test, shoot under conditions as close as practical to those under which the original rolls were shot. I hope this helps. Vernon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernhard Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Based on the data sheets the info above is correct, but from my experience it is not. Even when exposed at 400 both films tend to loose shadow detail and increase grain in the shadows, so that many people shoot them at 320 or 200 to begin with. So if I were in your shoes I'd have it pushed at least one stop. If shadow detail is important and you can tolerate some additional grain penalty push 2 stops. As both films have very low contrast, the increase in contrast from pushing is most likely not relevant. My experience with pushed XP2 however was rather mixed. I get better grain AND shadow detail with Tri-X or HP5 pushed in Xtol (processed my self) so that I essentially stopped pushing chromogenics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_eaton Posted June 22, 2003 Share Posted June 22, 2003 I'm for pushing a stop (at least a half) if you want the most from that film. Lattitude be damned - I can't stand any 400 speed or faster print/chromogenic film that's been under-exposed a full stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t_n1 Posted June 23, 2003 Share Posted June 23, 2003 Push it a full stop. I've underexposed XP2 and T400CN a full stop before. Prints look like crap from the Frontier when processed normally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pphaneuf Posted June 28, 2003 Share Posted June 28, 2003 <center><a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/1044037"><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1044037"></a></center> <p>This has been shot on Ilford XP2 Super, setting the ISO on my camera to 1600 and having the lab push process it by 3 stops. The weather was overcast, so the scene contrast was low, but XP can obviously stand a few stops of pushing without breaking a sweat (it's rather low contrast to start with). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now