Jump to content

Please help settle a very strange argument?


Recommended Posts

<p>Hello, I will not argue here and ask others not to either, but rather I am looking for an answer to a simple question that is relevant to one of the strangest arguments I have ever seen.</p>

<p>In the attached image, does the larger pattern at the top look like smaller pattern A, smaller pattern B, or neither one?</p>

<p>Thank you for your time.</p><div>00Xj1N-304591584.jpg.8c64557d3b049c971414fc42d93921aa.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It doesn't look like either one -- the top one has alternating black and white stripes on the sides; the bottom two have different shades of gray.</p>

<p>It is interesting to me that it looks closer to B than A. It should look more like A, because the darker grey is closer to middle grey, which is what I'd expect from the alternating black and white stripes.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The question, of course, is to gamma. If I scrunch down to desktop level and squint and cross my eyes so the stripes blend, they almost blend to look closer to B. Copying and pasting into PS, and zooming out to 50%, so the stripes actually do blend, it looks like A. My monitors were calibrated within the week with an i1Display2. I don't recall the gamma selected.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I wrote: </p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>It doesn't look like either one -- the top one has alternating black and white stripes on the sides; the bottom two have different shades of gray.<br>

It is interesting to me that it looks closer to B than A. It should look more like A, because the darker grey is closer to middle grey, which is what I'd expect from the alternating black and white stripes.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>I wonder whether it would look more like A if it were on black instead of white. (I realize this is a different question than the gamma question in the other thread; here I've moved on to human visual perception.)</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Which version here looks <em>correct</em>? <br>

Squint, rotate the display, look at the preview from across any sized room. And keep in mind, if one is right, the other are therefore wrong. <br>

Note they are identical, just zoomed differently in Photoshop. <br>

<img src="http://digitaldog.net/files/Zoom.tiff" alt="" /></p>

Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Joe, on my EyeOne Display calibrated 2004 G5 iMac viewed in color managed Safari, "B" looks like the top center larger version except the stripes are a solid gray and blend as one U-shaped solid gray with the bottom square on "B".</p>

<p>I don't know how you can derive anything from this viewing on an 8 bit video system. I wonder also if LCD panel and phasing technology can influence the downsampled appearance differences considering all the different answers you've been getting.</p>

<p>I remember the rise and fall pixel timing issues with CRT's as the argument against using eyeball calibrators that relied on raster line blending targets and as a determiner of actual gamma.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Okay... When I first looked at it, I though it doesn't look like either, it looks like a dark grey square over a light grey square with black and white striped lines on either side. However, when I look at it from a high angle toward the monitor it looks like A and from a low angle it looks like B.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...