Jump to content

Photo-flo or no?


shotz

Recommended Posts

Just a quick poll -

 

I have long used photo-flo and hung my B&W negs without squeegee and

all was fine. Now I am using Jobo and I am not supposed to use it

with my film on those plastic reels. So I take a few rolls and

after processing and washing just hang them up and sqeegee them.

Seems OK to me so far.

 

Can you guys weigh in on the issue of drying without photo-flo? ANy

problems I just haven't stumbled onto yet? Any other choices when

doin' the Jobo thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photo-flo is simply a purified detergent that breaks water surface tension and allows the water to dry in a thin even sheet over the film surface. You could use a drop of ordinary liquid laundry detergent but it would probably leave a soapy scum.

 

You should use something to break surface tension on the final water soak, but I do not like photo-flo since it seems to leave a slight residue.

 

I much prefer Edwal LFN. This comes in a small squeeze bottle and you use only one or two drops in the tank of water. It lasts a long time and leaves no residue. Excellent improvement over Photo-flo, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Photo-Flo but only a couple drops in a 2-reel tank, then squeegee with my fingers and hang to dry in one of those vinyl hanging boxes with the internal frame and front zippers (for want of a better term)they sell to keep clothes clean & moth-free in closet storage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can also do the final rinse in distilled water and use photo-flo or not. I do every thing I can do to keep anything from touching the surface of my negatives. After the rinse, I hang up and let dry without any contact with the surfaces of the film. I get then down and into protectors as soon as they dry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one has mentioned Agfa's Agepon.... I got a couple of bottles of this in a Porter's grab bag many, many years back. A couple of drops in a tank seems to be plently. It's easy to get too much wetting agent for the task, so it seems that very small quantitites go a long way and perform more as intended. Over the years, I've had people mention a haze on their negatives and it usually leads to a finding of wetting agent over-dosing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of which wetting agent you use, Sistan, Photo-Flo, Stabilizer, Dawn dishwashing detergent, etc., you will eventually build up a gummy deposit on your reels that's almost impossible to completely remove. You'd have to scrub with a toothbrush and an acidic cleanser after each use to avoid these deposits.

 

It doesn't matter if they're stainless or plastic, Jobo or Paterson, after time it will happen. Stainless reels however, will not be affected as much by this buildup, plastic will become a bear to load. This is why Jobo will recommend you perform these processes off the reel.

 

The other downside to this is those minute amounts of wetting agent clinging to your reel will affect the development of the film in the vicinity of the deposits by changing the surface tension and the specific gravity of the developer. See Patrick Grainer's discussion of aggitation or rumination on the Nov/Dec issue of Photo Techniques. Some of his discussion applies.

 

Your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the biggest problem with using Kodak Photo-flo is the 1:200

concentration is just way too much. I use it in distilled water for

the final rinse at 1:2000 (1ml eyedropper in 2 litres distilled water)

This is plenty to break the surface tension in distilled water.

No squeege or fingers on my film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Philopena wrote:<BR><BR><I>Regardless of which wetting agent you use, Sistan, Photo-Flo, Stabilizer, Dawn dishwashing detergent, etc., you will eventually build up a gummy deposit on your reels that's almost impossible to completely remove. You'd have to scrub with a toothbrush and an acidic cleanser after each use to avoid these deposits. <BR><BR>

It doesn't matter if they're stainless or plastic, Jobo or Paterson, after time it will happen. Stainless reels however, will not be affected as much by this buildup, plastic will become a bear to load. This is why Jobo will recommend you perform these processes off the reel. </I><BR><BR>

 

I have used wetting agent in my Paterson tank for 17 years, and never had this problem you're talking about. After the process I always rinse the tank and reel under the tap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some plastic reels that I have used since 1980, usually with some PhotoFlo used in the final rinse. I have never noticed any kind of deposits on these reels. It seems doubtful to me that the tiny amount of PhotoFlo that I am using could cause any kind of a deposit to build up. Perhaps some other chemical or reaction of chemicals is the problem.

 

I have learned the hard way to let nothing touch wet film. I end all processing with a bath in distilled water with one drop of PhotoFlo added to facilitate run off. It works great for me; the finished negatives are clean and free of water spots and are not damaged mechanically.

 

Joe Stephenson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...