oskar_ojala Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 <p>Lately I've done some stitched panoramas and I've been thinking that by adding a panning clamp to my setup it would be easier to take them, especially multi-row ones. So far I found the RRS PCL-1 http://reallyrightstuff.com/rrs/Itemdesc.asp?ic=PCL%2D1&eq=&Tp= and the equivalent Novoflex. The Novoflex costs $50 more and doesn't seem to offer any advantage and the RRS is not cheap either. So the questions are 1) does anyone have experience of these or similar products? Can you recommend them? 2) Do you know of a comparable cheaper product?<br> The thing needs to move a DSLR (usually up to 2 kg, 4 lbs) with reasonably sized lens with ease and precision so models aimed for digicams are not suitable.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett_richards Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 <p>I have one and it is my constatant companion. Built like a tank and does a great job.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 <p>I have an RRS PCL-1 on one head. It is made well and wobble-free. I also use L-brackets on my cameras, which avoids the need to "flop" the head for vertical shots. I doubt that the clamp has enough holding capacity to keep a front-heavy lens from slipping in the "flopped" position.</p><p>It is of minimal utility in making stitched panoramas, since using the PCL-1 level puts the camera exactly level with the horizon. This is necessary when working with interiors, but not for landscapes. For the latter, you usually want the horizon to be somewhere other than dead center. The PCL-1 is also handy when switching between small-format, medium format and lenses with tripod collars, since the RRS/Arca plates are oriented differently.</p><p>Kirk may have something a little cheaper, and perhaps others. If they aren't compatible with RRS/Arca plates, they're not worth considering.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 <p>I have an RRS PCL-1 on one head. It is made well and wobble-free. I also use L-brackets on my cameras, which avoids the need to "flop" the head for vertical shots. I doubt that the clamp has enough holding capacity to keep a front-heavy lens from slipping in the "flopped" position.</p> <p>It is of minimal utility in making stitched panoramas, since using the PCL-1 level puts the camera exactly level with the horizon. This is necessary when working with interiors, but not for landscapes. For the latter, you usually want the horizon to be somewhere other than dead center. The PCL-1 is also handy when switching between small-format, medium format and lenses with tripod collars, since the RRS/Arca plates are oriented differently.</p> <p>Kirk may have something a little cheaper, and perhaps others. If they aren't compatible with RRS/Arca plates, they're not worth considering.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oskar_ojala Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 <p>I was thinking to use it both directly on the head (where the horizon is in the middle...but cropping can help with that) but mainly on a L-bracket so that it handles the vertical movement in multi-row panoramas or vertical panoramas (camera + sliding plate attached to clamp). I was probably not clear in that the clamp should hold its position in other than perfectly level positions, but the sliding plate means that the center of gravity is not at the tripod mount.<br> I use Arca plates, so that's what I'm interested in.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chas_matthews Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>I too have an RRS PCL-1. Rather than mounting it directly on the tripod I have mine on a Acratech Leveling base. This allows leveling when needed and about 10 degrees of off level.<br> I could have used a ball head, but this is lighter.<br> The effect of having the camera off-center is not as severe as you might expect and actually puts the center of gravity of the camera and lens assembly more central on the tripod than just putting the camera and lens on a ball head.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now