q.g._de_bakker Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 See <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/02/08/polaroid_shu tting_2_mass_facilities_laying_off_150/" target="_blank">this</a> press report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_larese1 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Oh well, finally a good use for digital ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_wayne1 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 What all will this affect? Do you guys believe someone else will buy the technology to keep it going? Doesn't it stand to reason that they've already shopped this in order to keep from having to lay off all those people? I'm mostly interested in Hasselblad gear so how does this affect Hasselblad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_larese1 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Fuji may save the day for instant film users. It'd be great to think Polaroid and Kodak actually used reason, business sense and cared about their employees, but they've been missing the boat in my opinion since 2000. For $50 bucks get a lens adapter for your Hasselblad lenses to your digital SLR. Polaroid check with a histogram that you can actually use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antonio_garcia_russell Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Fuji are still going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankz Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 After having used both Fuji and Polaroid films, I personally like the Fuji better (the 100 speed pack film). I'm not aware of a substitute for the 58 and 59 films. Does Fuji have an entry here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Fuji doesn't do an equivalent of the Type 55 and 669 films though, do they (black and white with instant negative). I won't really miss the instant print films as much as the instant negative...Type 55 in 4x5 is a gorgeous, if delicate negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankz Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Stuart - Fuji makes/made some stuff designated FP100 (?) or something like that; I use it in my Hassy and Mamiya pola backs - I think those backs were built for 669 (or 6XX something), then again, maybe I have the numbers wrong. It wouldn't be a first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aplumpton Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Buy Fuji film, gentlemen, and Ilford-Harman papers. We must keep these producers happy, and profitable, to continue the great film tradition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_leong_lee Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Well, if you haven't bought any polaroid film in the last five years, then there's no reason to lament. Me? I've never had a polaroid camera, never bought a single piece of polaroid film in my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 Thanks Frank -- You are right about Fuji making an instant print film for medium format polaroid backs, but the difference is that Polariod's 669 film gave you a print AND a negative. You would take the negative out, wash it in sodium sulfite and then you had a negative that you could print in the normal darkroom or scan...they were beautiful negatives...very fine grain and lovely tonality. The fuji instant films don't give you a negative, just a print. So while they are useful for checking lighting and exposure, they don't give you the ability to make a nice print from the photo if the shot you made was a keeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_long Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 This news is horrible for me... a good portion of my work has depended on that "Polaroid" look which you don't really get with any other film. The Fuji stuff is fantastic, but you only have one color and one B&W to pick from, and it doesn't have that unique interpretation that Polaroid gives.<p>I agree that 669 and 55 also are great films. While it doesn't have any signature look (unless you include the negative film edges in your print), I love having the big neg in a matter of seconds.<p>I can only hope that Fuji somehow fills in the void. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cole_paquette Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 If enough people request the same film(like reproduceable negatives) then the company will usually produce it as long as there is demand, enough people may get fuji to produce all of those polaroid films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now