gib Posted September 30, 2002 Share Posted September 30, 2002 Nikon FM2, Nikkor 35mm f2, Tri-X, I let the lab do the processing. Hope I didnt break too many rules by linking it this way: <br><br> <a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo? topic_id=1481&msg_id=003nGX&photo_id=1021146&photo_sel_index=0"> to reach photo in my folder here on photo.net</a> <br><br> Any comments welcome. Regards Bill Gibson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hil3 Posted September 30, 2002 Share Posted September 30, 2002 Nice shot, very typical 35mm point-of-view. I like what you did with the perspective. It could be the scan or my monitor, but the mid to far focus seems a little soft. How does the print look? I would have been tempted to also try the same shot with a long focal length to compress the distance between the front and the pier. There looks like there are people on the end and I like the human element in most shots and a long lens would have brought them in. But then again, I probably would have been there with my 35/2 too! I make myself use one lens at a time almost always. (Brave of you to trust a lab with B&W, especially tri-x. I gave that up after a try or two and now develop my tri-x at home.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gib Posted September 30, 2002 Author Share Posted September 30, 2002 actually there was no one at the end of the dock, just some larger pipes....there was just a lifeguard and she didnt seem too intrigued by camera outing. I am looking into developing my own bw, but maybe just the negs to start.... thanks for the comments. I think the softness is from the scanner.... I need to work on my technique with that as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hil3 Posted September 30, 2002 Share Posted September 30, 2002 That's all I'm doing now - developing the film at home. I tried a few rolls of Tri-X in HC-110 1:63 and liked the results very much. I am now going through a calibration routine to find my optimal E.I. My next step, in a few months or so, is printing the negs myself. I tried the chromogenic B&W's from Kodak, 400CN, B&W 400, you know, the ones that develop in C41 at your local 1-hr-photo, but did not like the results. Too smooth for me, pudding-like tonality. Did not "look" like a B&W to me. Guess I like a little grain and sharpness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd thacker Posted October 1, 2002 Share Posted October 1, 2002 I like the way the pier in the background echos the board in the foreground, and the triangular shape that's formed between them by the rope. I also like how it says "rescue" on the board - that really makes the shot, in my view. And the way the line begins up front and then takes you out to the distant flat horizon - as though what promises to rescue you is what will take you over the edge - is frankly frightening. Reminds me of some of Ralph Gibson's work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd thacker Posted October 1, 2002 Share Posted October 1, 2002 Btw, any relation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gib Posted October 1, 2002 Author Share Posted October 1, 2002 relation to Ralph Gibson? no. And I am not the scifi writer either. That question has come up fairly frequently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now