Jump to content

nikon f4s lenses / vintage / time appropriate


memphis1

Recommended Posts

<p>did sigma, tokina or others make a fisheye lens in this period?</p>

<p>also are there good period tokina / sigma 400+ lenses that won't break the bank? <br>

seems the nikkors are still out of my price range....</p>

<p>what are some of the accessories i can nab for my f4s?<br>

the f4s was a great camera --- may have to get a new viewfinder someday as i have the lcd bleed.... finder still works great though</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have a Vivitar 400/5.6 in TX mount that would be right about the correct vintage, though it's manual focus. It came out in about 1978. Not great, but not bad. Mine is in Minolta mount. The earlier T4 mount was not AI compatible or convertible, but the TX is, as far as I know. I think several of the makers mentioned made very short lenses during that time, but all were manual focus, and I'm not sure of the mounts. Sigma went down to 8 mm. and had made fisheyes for other brand names for a long time. They also have made a few longer lenses more recently in both manual and auto focus. They did a 400/5.6 APO in both, I think. <br>

Here's a page from a now defunct site, which has fortunately been archived:<br>

http://web.archive.org/web/20021203000649/http://medfmt.8k.com/third/cult.html<br>

My F4s has LCD bleed too, but at the price I paid I'm happy enough that I can read the numbers and it works. <br>

<br />One accessory I like for the F4S (which I have unfortunately mislaid or lost recently!) is the flip-up eyepiece magnifier. Make sure you get the right thread or adapter, though. The F4 takes the HP size, common to the F3HP, F4, F6 and F100. It's larger than the old F/Nikkormat/F2/F3 size. Other than that and a cable release, though, I can't think of much that an F4 needs. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Tokina made an AT-X AF 400mm f/5.6 during the F4 era (<a href="http://photo-gear.net/tokina-at-x-af-400mm-f5-5-sd/">http://photo-gear.net/tokina-at-x-af-400mm-f5-5-sd/</a>). Nice handling, well built lens at an affordable price. I had one in Minolta AF mount, but they made it in Nikon AF mount as well.</p>

<p>With respect to LCD bleed, depending on which field is bleeding it might be in the body, so a new viewfinder might not fix that. The lower display is in the finder, the upper right displays to the left of the ADR f/stop readout are in the body.</p>

<p>Best accessory for the F4s is the 4-cell MB-20 battery pack. Load it with some AA lithiums and it downsizes the beast considerably.</p>

<p>Enjoy. :-)</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>really gonna have to hunt down that sigma... have the cable release, the 24-120, the 75-300, a tokina and a sigma.... all useful -- my backup body is a ratty n90s with a sticky back<br>

]</p>

<p>even have the hove magic lantern book (look at the high end of those price wise on amazon)</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>have spent some time today just taking glam shots of my cameras- -- the camera gets beastly heavy with the 75-300 and a flash, plus the bag of everything - digital certainly is lighter -- usually the 50/1.8 is my goto lens, keeping the 75-300 on the finepix s2 as it becomes a 500 and has a handy macro function and the 20-35 on the n90s --- the n90s is the film camera i use for lightning shots as it's more expendable....</p>

<p>quick question, on the grip, the rubber is coming loose on the area where the fingers usually rest... any quick fixes? double sided tape or is this a nikon issue- -- off to shoot some pics</p><div>00bqMZ-541470584.jpg.6df04ec8d81e4ff28d858ce033cf541c.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I owned a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 lens of about that vintage for all of two days, after which I took it back to exchange for a Tamron. The Sigma was an absolute dog.</p>

<p>Some Tokina AT-X pro lenses were (and still are) very good. I have a 20-35mm f/2.8 AT-X pro that still gives good results with a D800. It needs stopping down a touch, but it's really not too bad at all for a superwide zoom, and the build quality is second to none.</p>

<p>+1 to the Sigma AF 400mm f/5.6 Apo (red line) version - <strong>if</strong> you can find one in good condition. These lenses tend to grow some sort of mist on the inner elements, which I'm not sure can be removed. In any case they're not easy to dismantle, so a misty Sigma 400mm could be an expensive item to put right, if at all. There's also Tokina's 80-400mm f/4.5~5.6 zoom to consider.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>i want the 250 shot back for the f4s, but it's such an obscure item, servicing would be problematic, plus, with all my gear, i'd never finish a roll..... and... who would process the 250 exposures? loading and unloading could be problematic as well --- has anyone ever used this in the real world?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...