monsoonphoto.net Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 I've just had a chance to look at some of the latest Japanesephotography magazines which feature the new offerings fromCosina/Voigtlander. There are four new items. Unfortunately, I don'thave a flatbed scanner, so you'll just have to take my word for it. :-)Also, understand that my Japanese isn't very good, so I apologize forany errors in advance.<P>1) <B>Bessa R3A</B><P>- Auto exposure (aperture-priority)<BR>- 1.0x magnification<BR>- Includes a 40mm frameline<BR>- Available from October, 50,000 yen<BR>- Resembles the Epson RD-1<BR> <P>2) <B>Bessa R2A</B><P>- Auto exposure (aperture-priority)<BR>- 0.7x magnification<BR>- Available from December, 50,000 yen<BR>- Resembles the Epson RD-1<BR> <P>3) <B>Voigtlander 40/1.4 in M-mount</B><P>- As compact as the CV 35/2.5 Pancake II<BR>- Uses a new lens hood<BR> <P>4) <B>Voigtlander Light Meter II</B><P>- Clip-on light meter, similar to previous model, but more compact andflatter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david dutchison Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 This is a link to the Epson RD-1 http://www.dpreview.com/news/0403/04031101epsonrd1.asp 23.7 X 15.6 CCD, oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsoonphoto.net Posted September 18, 2004 Author Share Posted September 18, 2004 I've found a picture! <P><img src="http://www.nippon-camera.com/zassi/z0410/toku5.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ho_ho Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 HaHa, I can finally get rid of the 40mm rokkor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul t Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 mmm, maybe I can forget about buying a Hexar RF (want AE, but not necessarily a motor) and can keep my Summicron C! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiba Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Then it would appear that the Zeiss is based on something else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Williams Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Interesting that it looks nothing like the new Zeiss camera. The plot thickens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_burke3 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 That looks like the same rangefinder base length as the R & R2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien1 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 It make the Zeiss Ikon even more nicer.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rover Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Tom is right, same baselength is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__stu_evans Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Looks like a Zorki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsoonphoto.net Posted September 18, 2004 Author Share Posted September 18, 2004 <H1><B>CORRECTION</B></H1> <P> Thanks to Karan Nakamura on CVUG for pointing this out: <I>"The MSRP price for both is Y75,000 (about US$700), not Y50,000 --this is the price of the new 40mm f/1.4."</I> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taffer Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Agree with Stu, the top plate reminds me of the one on the Zorki 4/4K... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joel_matherson Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 It doesnt have the same effective baselength. As Alan as described it has a 1.0 finder so even if it has the same basic baselength as the R/R2 the EFB is greater. Also remember that the Rollei spin off, was the only way to get a R2 in chrome, so it could well be possible with this new Zeiss body too will be the R3a, but with different chrome metal finished panels rather than just a silver paint job. The fact that Zeiss already have a 40mm lens and Voigtlander have created another but one that doesnt conflict with the 2.8 Zeiss one, may mean that they are covering all speed bases in the 40mm focal length and allowing fans of the 40mm f2 Rokkor/Summicrons to have a place in there too. (The 40mm F2 being a favourite with Mr K of Cosina) CLE prices will now fall dramatically I think! I am very excited about the new 40mm f1.4, being a 40mm focal length fan (with CL/CLE's) I will be getting one for sure. It will be the fastest 40mm lens created by any manufacturer if im not very much mistaken. A new smaller meter will be great too and I bet they have address the exposure lock complaint alot of people have with the first version. I will have to start saving for one of each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim Ghantous Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Although my first guess is that the Zeiss camera is a digital rangefinder, there is another possibility: it could be a medium format camera having an aspect ratio of about 1.85:1 or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_aitken Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 That compact 40mm f1.4 is a very astute move. Breathes new life into the CL/CLE's (should still be just within their focussing ability) and is a perfect match for the M6 etc 35mm framelines. I bet these sell like hot cakes (if the price is right). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiba Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 According to another Japanese site, there are two versions of the new 40mm lens, the regular and a S.C. model, the latter of which is a limited edition of 500. The Japanese description translates to "monolayer coat", so I guess it's simply "Single Coated". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_elek Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 It could be that Zeiss -- being more demanding -- is either providing or using a different rangefinder system that is more in line with the classic Contax user. Either way, things are definitely getting more interesting. The longer base certainly lends itself to a longer lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek_stanton2 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Could someone 'splain the "rangefinder base length" thing to me? I understand finder magnification, but how can you tell what the base length is from the photo? How do the two photos above show similar base lengths? This is jazzy news, whatever the eventual products become. Just knowing there are still companies dedicated to developing film-based cameras/lenses. I'll be happy now, as long as Kodak can continue production of PlusX, TriX, Portra, and some E6.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joel_matherson Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 What filter size forthe 40mm do you reckon? Looks bigger than th usual 39mm, 43mm maybe? A monocoated version, hmmm interesting but odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saw1 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Wonder if the new camera(s) are any quieter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsoonphoto.net Posted September 18, 2004 Author Share Posted September 18, 2004 Oh, another thing, it appears the finger winder from previous models will work on the new Bessas -- at least that's what the pictures in the magazines show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_marshall1 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Derek, each camera has 2 larger "windows" positioned above & to the right of the lens. There is a much, much smaller "window" to the left of these. On the Zeiss Ikon, it is much farther to the left. The distance between this small window & the farther right of the 2 larger windows is the baseline of the rangefinder. It is obviously much longer on the Zeiss Ikon than on the Bessa R3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shambrick007 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 "3) Voigtlander 40/1.4 in M-mount"<p>Sweet! Now I don't feel so bad for selling my 50/1.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christopher_engeler Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 What I see coming out from Cosina-Voigtlander and Contax leaves the Minolta CLE and it's predecessor the Leica CL as the king of compact M-cameras. Joel: I believe prices of the CLE will actually increase. Remember, only about 20,000 were built. With the new 40mm lenses (Rollei Sonnar 40mm/2.8, the elusive Rollei 40mm/1.8 which is in the Rollei 35RF literature, and the new CV 40mm/1.4), there are even more choices for CLE fans. A great combination is also the superb CV 28mm/3.5 on the CLE. It is getting harder and harder to get CLE's. I also like the TTL flash capability which is probably going to stay a Leica exclusive for the time being. When was the last time you saw a decent Minolta CLE on eBay? A market niche waiting for an update, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now