tim_atherton2 Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 New policy from the TSA (thanks to the ASMP) http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1248.xml EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY Thanks to the efforts of the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP) and the cooperation and understanding of the Transportation Security Administration, working photographers and other members of the traveling public may now take on board an additional piece of carry-on baggage containing photographic equipment. This means that you are allowed to carry on two bags � when at least one is photographic equipment � along with a personal item. This accommodation will make it easier to travel for working photographers with sensitive and valuable equipment. Document Checkers are being informed at this time of the change in Transportation Security Administration (TSA) regulations. The TSA has said to go ahead at this time and take advantage of the new policy. Be advised that some Document Checkers may not be aware of the change in policy and this will require your speaking to the airline's customer servic= e personnel. Also, the additional bag must conform to the carry-on regulatio= ns for size and weight. There will still be occasions when there simply is no= space available on board for additional carry-on and this will require chec= king a bag. -0-0-0- Travelers & Consumers Transporting Special Items Film and Photographic Equipment Traveling with Photographic Equipment You may carry one (1) bag of photographic equipment in addition to one (1) =carry-on and one (1) personal item through the screening checkpoint. The additional bag must conform to your air carrier's carry-on restrictions for= size and weight. Please confirm your air carrier's restrictions prior to arrivi=ng at the airport. In cooperation with the American Society of Media Photographers, this policy was expanded primarily to accommodate working photographers traveling with sensitive, valuable equipment. Working photographers, and other members of the traveling public, are encouraged to carry photographic equipment and film as carry-on luggage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neal_shields Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 I really needed that when I went to the Solomons in August. I ended up leaving my underwater video equipment behind, in favor of my wife's still equipment. In my case it wasn't the extra bag I needed but the extra weight that the extra bag would have provided. Qantas limits each carry on to 15# and underwater camera gear is very heavy. Note: we were on business class and it was the TSA policy that limited us to one carry on and one personal item. However, in coach we would have only been allowed one carry on and one personal item anyway, so the TSA policy change won't matter in many cases. Better late than never I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnorman2 Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 <p>tim - "photogorpahic" pretty funny, it's nice to see i'm not the only dislexic typer here...</p> <p><i>The title was later revised by a moderator....</i></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philip_sweeney Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 Not mentioned, but I guess they are still going to want to inspect or xray our film boxes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_blackman1 Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 thats ok for travel within the US, but in needs to be copied elsewhere to be really useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_briggs2 Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 <p><i>Not mentioned, but I guess they are still going to want to inspect or xray our film boxes?</i></p> <p>The TSA is supposed to inspect film without x-rays upon passenger request. See <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1035.xml">http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1035.xml</a>. In fact (see link), the TSA <b>recommends</b> hand inspection for "Sheet film", "Large format film" and "If the same role [sic] of film is exposed to X-ray inspections more than 5 times before it is developed, however, damage may occur. Protect your film by requesting a hand-inspection for your film if it has already passed through the carry-on baggage screening equipment (X-ray) more than 5 times.".</p> <p>This has been the policy all along. In fact, it is the law in the USA. <a href="http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfilter.cgi?DB=1&ACTION=View&QUERY=1544.211&RGN=BSEC&OP=and&QUERY=49&RGN=BTI&QUERY=5797&RGN=BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET&FROM=1&ITEM=1"> Paragraph 4 of section 1544.211 of Chapter XII of Part 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations</a> is "<i>If requested by individuals, their photographic equipment and film packages must be inspected without exposure to an X-ray system.</i>". I am not a lawyer and don't know if some other rule supersedes this one. The quoted regulation seems crystal clear.</p> <p>However, many of the screeners seem ignorant of the TSA policy and Federal regulation (even though that one may request hand inspection is on signs along the waiting area to be screened!) and will insist on x-raying boxes of sheet film if they show metal content when tested with a wand. I can understand their concern about a box that can't be opened. Usually if the metal content is low (plastic rather than foil bag inside), one can persuade them to test with the wand and explosive trace test instead of with x-rays.</p> <p>The sign mentioned in the previous paragraph are always present in the US because they are also required by Federal regulation: paragraph 3 is "<i>The signs required under this paragraph (e) must notify individuals that such items are being inspected by an X-ray and advise them to remove all X-ray, scientific, and high-speed film from accessible property and checked baggage before inspection. This sign must also advise individuals that they may request that an inspection be made of their photographic equipment and film packages without exposure to an X-ray system.</i>"</p> <p>A previous thread on this topic, with arguments both ways about the legal situation: <a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005dEg">http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005dEg</a>.</p> <p>P.S. A clickable link to the new extra-bag policy: <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1248.xml">http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1248.xml</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric rose Posted November 24, 2003 Share Posted November 24, 2003 This policy has to be set by the individual airlines not by the TSA. It has been allowed for sometime by the airlines to permit passengers 1 carry on plus a camera bag of reasonable size. But again it's a call made by the airline. One thing to keep in mind is if on a multi carrier itinerary the first carrier might permit it, but the next might not so in that case you will have to check the camera bag. Best to make sure your travel agent finds this out for you ahead of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now