karl_keung Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 I recently acquired a never used 2.8E, which comes with the red ribbon, wooden take up spool and sillica gel capsule. is there a way to remove the ribbon without breaking it? <br><br> <a href=" title="DSC_9083.JPG by Rolleiflex lover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2281/2174262037_772b1f0cf3.jpg" width="500" height="409" alt="DSC_9083.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9086.JPG by Rolleiflex lover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2240/2175051730_4ec55aea3f.jpg" width="500" height="474" alt="DSC_9086.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9087.JPG by Rolleiflex lover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2365/2174262555_0ddaac6609.jpg" width="500" height="473" alt="DSC_9087.JPG" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Dang! Why would you want to remove it? It's a work of art! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Pay attention. It shows how film goes in. It is also probably proof of it being new and unused . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_reichert1 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Beautiful. Just beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_oleson Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 actually, it doesn't look like it shows how the film goes in.. it doesn't seem to be going through the counter rollers. Man, that's a pretty camera! I don't do the "mint" thing, but I think I'd have a tear in my eye as I removed that ribbon..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fwstutterheim Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 I would leave it this way. You are probably going to loose a couple a hundred bucks by removing the ribbons. May be even more. This is a collectors item not a user camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_marvin Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 I usually think that cameras are for USE, but, in this case, I'd think about selling this mint camera, buying a "merely" excellent 2.8E, paying for a first rate CLA and using the left over money to buy something else :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 8, 2008 Author Share Posted January 8, 2008 I think I will leave it that way, it has earned it, I must preserve it for the future generations. the stud also appears to be a fixed one, meaning it is not those studs found on one's shirt. I don't think later Rolleiflex 2.8F came with this ribbon. <br><br> <a href=" title="DSC_9110.JPG by rolleiflex 2.8E, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2418/2177567069_07b0c91b1d.jpg" width="500" height="363" alt="DSC_9110.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9109.JPG by mr_deacons, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/2177566807_3faedfcc48.jpg" width="500" height="358" alt="DSC_9109.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9107.JPG by mr_deacons, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2177566541_f4ec602106.jpg" width="500" height="397" alt="DSC_9107.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9105.JPG by mr_deacons, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2209/2177566315_29fdd54e58.jpg" width="500" height="466" alt="DSC_9105.JPG" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 8, 2008 Author Share Posted January 8, 2008 I think I will leave it that way, it has earned it, I must preserve it for the future generations. the stud also appears to be a fixed one, meaning it is not those studs found on one's shirt. I don't think later Rolleiflex 2.8F came with this ribbon. <br><br> <a href=" title="DSC_9110.JPG by rolleiflex 2.8E, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2418/2177567069_07b0c91b1d.jpg" width="500" height="363" alt="DSC_9110.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9109.JPG by rolleiflex 2.8E, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/2177566807_3faedfcc48.jpg" width="500" height="358" alt="DSC_9109.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9107.JPG by rolleiflex 2.8E, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2177566541_f4ec602106.jpg" width="500" height="397" alt="DSC_9107.JPG" /></a> <a href=" title="DSC_9105.JPG by rolleiflex 2.8E, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2209/2177566315_29fdd54e58.jpg" width="500" height="466" alt="DSC_9105.JPG" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lauren_macintosh Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Build a bullet proof case and put a small pillow in it and let the rollei rest there and be admired :Just look at that shine ,many people are chocking up when they look at that beauty : I would admire it and see about selling it to a collector and do as Mr Marvin and other state here: Ohhhhh what a find: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 8, 2008 Author Share Posted January 8, 2008 personally I think 2.8E is the most beautiful 2.8, it is the heaviest when compared with 2.8D and 2.8F. I had a white face 2.8F before, but I just felt the white face is less well/solid constructed as the earlier ones. as said above, it is simply beautiful, and it smells goods too, real leather cover, as opposed to the plastic cover adopted by those late 2.8Fs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kram Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Cut the ribbon and make art with it! It's like owning a car and never driving it. Can you tell that I'm not a collector? Better yet, sell it and buy a user 2.8E and several cases of film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick_lutz Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 HI there, Just out of curiosity, is this camera in Japan? Where did you buy this piece of art? Based on the magazine you used as a backdrop, there might be a Japan connection somewhere? What magazine is it? I wouldn't mind reading it as well? Cheers, Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz_grabun Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 Man, wonderfully beautiful camera. Congrats on your purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_west1 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Hello Karl - cautious greetings from England! Hasn't anyone on this fine forum alerted you of the extreme danger you are in? What you have is NOT a camera. It is what we in Bomb Disposal call an "RDD" (radiological dispersal device) which in brief means it is a radiological weapon which combines radioactive material with conventional explosives - a dirty bomb in other words. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES TAMPER WITH THE FUSE (fuses often resemble innocent looking ribbons by the way) This is what you must do straight away: Wrap the device carefully in several layers of bubble wrap, then place it in a stout cardboard box, seal it, then call this number immediately [+44] (0) 1963-868424. I will arrange collection by a member of my squad at no cost to you whatsoever. Here's the last one we had by the way......<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 Hi Peter, I will consider your proposal seriously :-) <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2207/2186767837_342b6e305e_o.jpg" width="800" height="373" alt="DSC_9198.JPG" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_west1 Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 Your generosity is exceeded only by your personal charm! In all seriousness, what a wise collector you are. Fabulous..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 Peter: thanks and appreciate our mutual love for the fine things in life, looking back at the film age, only a few is worth owning. <br> Nick: I bought it from a friend, whose father bought the camera in 1959. The magazine at the background is indeed a Japanese camera magazine, amazing read. <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2356/2187600528_853d80622f_o.jpg" width="800" height="1101" alt="img001.jpg" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 a few pages in that magazine: <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2004/2187635500_32e4332931_o.jpg" width="800" height="1162" alt="img004.jpg" /></a> <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2280/2187635322_3c1cbff3bd_o.jpg" width="800" height="1163" alt="img003.jpg" /></a> <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2409/2186848737_6708cf71ec_o.jpg" width="800" height="1186" alt="img002.jpg" /></a> <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2072/2187635712_710e967dd1_o.jpg" width="800" height="1158" alt="img005.jpg" /></a> <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2101/2187636008_1e87f75b29_o.jpg" width="800" height="1104" alt="img006.jpg" /></a> <br> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2146/2187656174_022fb8eaed_o.jpg" width="800" height="1173" alt="img007.jpg" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2215/2186869833_68ec39b4fd_o.jpg" width="800" height="1152" alt="img008.jpg" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_keung Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2181/2187656560_0eba752226_o.jpg" width="800" height="1149" alt="img009.jpg" /></a> <br> <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2232/2186870279_a092bdff95_o.jpg" width="800" height="1151" alt="img010.jpg" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_west1 Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 Thanks for sharing....... And, of course, let's not forget the now seldom talked-about "Tele-Rollei" which was a wonderful tool. Granted, not as pretty looking as the 2.8E, but a fine maker of pictures all the same. I have to this day B&W negs AND prints that I took of my children growing up more than 40 years ago! I look at them today with mist filled eyes [at the bromide prints I mean, not my children :) ] and now understand the old saying "progress does not always mean moving in a forward direction." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_landis Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 This camera belongs in a museum (The Museum of Modern Art?) I could take it there personally so as to ensure the safest delivery. Just email me and we can work out the details. All seriousness- buy a used one and treasure this for the next 1000 years - it is a work of art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_overton Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 I am speechless. Absolutely beautiful. This camera deserves cotton glove treatment. Yes it is yours, but it belongs to future generations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now