Neopan 400 and Acufine is great.

<p>I just ran a roll of this great film with Acufine I shot part of the roll at 1250 and part at 1600 No difference I could se Sharp great tones and I think it is better than Tri-X at the same speeds I used 7 minutes at 20C.<br /> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jokerphotography/sets/72157625462845683/</p>

<p>Please don't be scared by the ugly face in the 1st one. but look at the pores in my face... :)<br /> <img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5168/5257325882_fddb323c20_z.jpg" alt="" width="603" height="640" /><br>

<br /> <img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5207/5257332362_dfed4cc4a6_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="397" /></p>

<p>Larry:<br>

Very nice results. Did you use your Acufine diluted or undiluted? I have found Acufine to be a fine developer both ways, especially with Neopan 400. <br>

Jim</p>

<p>Undiluted. I replenish it. I have used it diluted the 1-3 times on the MDC are ones I submitted.</p>

<p>Larry, are those images scanned from enlargements on silver-halide B&W paper or are they negative scans?<br>

Sadly, many negatives never get enlarged using a traditional wet process.</p>

<p>Negative scans Epson V700.</p>