robert_george4 Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Ok, after much research and reading the posts on this forum I have narrowed it down to the following: 1.NEC Multisync LCD 2090UXi or 2.NEC Multisync LCD 2070NX I know that these are both S-IPS, have excellent specs (almost identical) and have gotten good reviews from users as well as from several technical review sites. Before I jump in I would like to get some practical advice about the real world use. Especially since the 2090 at $1075 is 2+ times the price of the 2070 at $475. These are the best internet prices in the US that I can find from known suppliers. I?m not exactly a pro so I probably don?t need every last drop of color control perfection but I do want to be able to color calibrate it and I do want good performance. I do need this to be very good for photo editing and retouching but also for day to day use for general office type work etc. So, is the 12 bit LUT and the 12 bit gamma correction really worth the price difference and can I get the same performance from the 2070 if it is properly calibrated and can I calibrate it properly without the advantage of these? What else may I be missing? I have to admit that I'm not sure that I really understand the adsvantage of the LUT capability on the 2090 UXi. Your perspective, as always, will be most appreciated. Thanks again, Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfaromeo Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Im thinking of buying 2070NX, they both are 8-bits panels, can not justify paying $500 more for gamma correction only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruce_rubenstein Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I recently bought the 2070NX. I think that the only practical difference difference is that the screen on the 2090 may be either hand picked or a different screen (same technology though). I use the Optix Monaco XR Pro to calibrate my monitors. The 2070NX calibrates to an average Delta E of around 1, with no single test patch being above 2.0. (monitor set to native white and calibrated to D65) From what I've read, the 2090UX will calibrate a bit tighter. Setting the brightness took some trial and error. I found that a setting of 110 cd/m^2 is pretty good. Brighter settings look very snappy, but have way more punch than any print. At lower brightness settings the monitor doesn't calibrate as well (Delta E of 1.5 at 100 cd/m^2). Overall, I don't think that any differences between the monitors, after being calibrated, will be visible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_george4 Posted October 29, 2006 Author Share Posted October 29, 2006 Jerry and Bruce, Thanks for your opinions. After more review and thought I have decided to go with the LCD 2070NX. I can't justify the price difference at this time and since so much will change over the next year it seems wise to limit the cost right now. Also I have seen the 2070NX and it is a beautiful monitor. Based upon you experience, Bruce, I should have no issue with the pictute quality after calibration. Several other owners also said that it calibrated right up using Spyder, Monaco or other systems. I'll order it from NewEgg tomorrow. Thanks again Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlx_neue Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 i'm thinking about buying this LCD, i'm just wondering if it's not outdated. My budget is 500?? max (680$). Is there new alternives better ? cheaper ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now