Jump to content

My Leica M3


Recommended Posts

Here are a few pics of my M equipment.

 

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561442-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561437-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561448-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561445-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561451-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561449-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561447-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561446-md.jpg"> <br><br>

<br><br>

 

I bought most of this equipment locally from a gentleman who bought

them new in Germany while he was stationed there. The photos are

simple and not "artsy" as some want on PN. It's simple my M equipment

that I use and love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As seen above, there is a 50/2 Summicron rigid attached to the M3. I have also a 50 collapsible Summicron, a 35/2 with goggles, a 90 Summicron with fixed lens hood, and a Minolta Rokkor 28/2.8 that is free of white spots that seem to be a common problem with this lens.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, Raid! It's a weird thing to really like a lens that long (comparatively speaking), but I find it very useful, sharp and relatively easy to use, in spite of its weight. For a while, it never left one of my M6TTLs.

 

Mine, however, is black, which makes it kinda difficult to photograph.

 

Is your meter in a bag? I just don't see it.

 

BTW, I use a MR meter on my M3. Not historically accurate but then, it gets the job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have four more pics. One is of the 90 Summicron and the others are of the M3 with the Canon 50/1.2 and matching lens hood. <br> <br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561965-md.jpg"> <br> <br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561963-md.jpg"> <br> <br>

 

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561962-md.jpg"> <br> <br>

 

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3561959-md.jpg"> <br> <br>

 

I hope nobody minds such postings; it's not to show off. I enjoy taking a look at M cameras and lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the Leitz equivalent for the R. This lens is for the Konica SLR line. It has 9 elements, one of them floating. It also has the UC (Ultra Coating) that makes it as transparent as an SMC or T*.

 

One of these come up maybe once every year or two on ebay. I haven't seen any being offered in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Melvin: The Rokkor is a very good lens for its price. If the Elmarit is a 10, then it is a 9, in my opinion and also based on what I have seen posted here on PN regarding this issue. It is less contrasty [i have read] than the Elmarit, but for all practical purposes, it is a fine performer. Note that this lens seems to be suffering from "white dots" that appear on/in the lens. My lens luckily for me does not display this feature. The white dots have been discussed at length here on PN. I'm not sure if people agreed what the real reason is for getting these dots. I guess, if the lens has these dots, then contrast may suffer? Maybe someone here can jump in and add/clarify. I don't use anymore 28mm lenses often so it is more economical and practical for me to stick to my little Rokkor lens than to switch to a more exotic Elmarit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...