alwin_lai Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Just wondering what are your thoughts on those music when you load up a photographer's website? Do you think it adds to the ambience and emotion or it is cheesy and sucks up bandwidth?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hector Javkin Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>It makes me think the photographer doesn't think enough of his work to let me view it without specific music to influence my mood. It makes me wonder if the photographer, who would undoubtedly be upset if someone used one of his precious images without permission, might be using the music without permission. If it's the site of someone I already know and like, I'll take the time to hit the "mute" button on my keyboard or to yank the headphones off my head. If I don't know the person, I immediately go to another site and will only return by mistake. Come to think of it, I can't stand being asked about music on photography sites. Does that answer you question?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate it. Remember that people may be at work, or in a place where they are not expecting noise.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingemar_lampa1 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate. And anything that uses Flash.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbalko Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate it.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don_cooper Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Instant click on my mouse's 'back' key, bye bye.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upriver Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Dislike immensely and marketing surveys indicate that it's a poor practice if you wish to keep viewers engaged any length of time.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Laur Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 It's a bad idea for many reasons. Save it for very specific presentation situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_poel Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate.</p> <p>Hmmmm....that's 9 hates and 0 likes. I sense a trend here.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richsimmons Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>#10. Hate. I will turn it off immediately or leave the site if nothing immediately catches my interest.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noreen Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Just to add a female opinion, not that it's going to be any different! <g></p> <p>11) Hate, and I will neither return nor recommend the site to others. (In fact, I am likely to warn others away.)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles_Webster Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>+1 more for hate</p> <p><Chas></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szrimaging Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate it. I usually have different audio running, and when I hear this stuff pop over top of it, well, I just want it gone, instantly. Most of the time that means a back button off the site.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former P.N Member Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate it, as well as 'Flash' sites.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwin_lai Posted March 3, 2011 Author Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>I wonder what some wedding photographers think about this. BTW, I too would hit the mute button only if I am not annoyed already by the slow loading flash count down.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_josefsson Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 <p>Hate. I am fully capable of choosing my own music, thank you very much. Unless the music <strong>really</strong> adds some value that is, perhaps a soundtrack of a bird while watching it etc. I'd stay away from the site in the future.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sknowles Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 <p>Neither, just add the "Sound Off" button so I can choose.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tompickering Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Hate it. and it kills any potential you might have for surreptitious cubicle surfers to visit your site. <br /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cristian_bosch Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 <p>wow! it's almost unanimous, music is out for the count. My two cents: in 99% of cases it's tacky.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sknowles Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 <p>A question. Why are you asking photographers who probably won't visit your Website outside of reviewing it for comments or criticism (like here)? Design your Website for your customers and clients. If we don't like it, that's our problem. Many wedding and portrait photographers use music because, if done right, it enhances the visitor's experience.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslie_cheung Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 <p>Yeahhh, I'm all for music if it's done well and click with the pics. I don't get why all these folks hate music so much...Music is one of the few thing that's more universal than photography. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Laur Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 <p>Leslie: nobody said they hate <em>music</em>. What they don't like is a web site playing music they haven't asked to hear, possibly interfering with other background audio tasks they have running, munching up a Skype session, disturbing co-workers, requiring the visitor to re-configure the audio settings on their computer/device for balance, or any number of other things. A gallery on a web site, navigated to via links that clearly say With/Without Music - that sort of thing is the polite way to go, if the photographs so desparately need the music to go with them.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wogears Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 <p>Music starts, I'm gone.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslie_cheung Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 <p>Yeah Matt, I know it's music *on the website* and not music itself people hate but I *do* get a sense of anti music sentiment here. FWIW, I think the artist should present his work however he/she wants to. If the viewer don't like the music, they wlll lower the volume or mute it...not a big deal to me. But it seems it's a huge deal for most here.</p> <p>Also, I never said pictures should 'need' music to go with it. IMO, photos should stand on their own. not with music, caprions nor titles etc...But they can enhance the viewing experience. Rarely maybe, but they could.</p> <p>I would, on the other hand, get annoyed if a site ask me if I wanted music or not. Large jpeg or medium or small...Caption / title or not etc, etc...Just friggin' present your work the way you want. </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now