arthuryeo Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Is it possible? Reviews from Luminous-you-know-who essentially said ... yea, youcan but ... focus is not accurate and you need to bracket the focusing ... blahblah blah ...<p><p>So, I ask, "When do you do IR photography at f/1.4 or f/1.0?" 80% or more of allIR photos I saw are landscape with greens in there and with that in mind, whatf-stop do you use? Should I worry about focusing inaccuracies? You tell me.<p><p>Slapped the Hoya R72 filters on the M8 and went for a walk and the mystery issolved.<p><p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6022417-lg.jpg"><p><p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6022423-lg.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Totally unacceptable for a $5000 camera. The grey tones are all wrong. Oh wait, .... :-) Very nice, Arthur. I have a deep red filter and need to try this again; I did a little experimenting with the M8 and IR when I first got it but haven't gotten back to it; your photos provide the needed inspiration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted May 28, 2007 Author Share Posted May 28, 2007 You can blame it on Guy M. and JaapV ... they started the ball rolling and I thot I give it a try myself. It wasn't that demanding compared to film-based IR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 When you have lemons, make lemonade. Very nice. I would exploit this more. Didn`t mean the M8 was a real bad lemon, but there have been some problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtdnyc Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Anyone know which, if any, of the M lenses might be corrected into the IR range, so that no refocusing would even be necessary? I think some of the R APO lenses have such extended correction, but I don't recall whether any of the M's do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted May 28, 2007 Author Share Posted May 28, 2007 Why would you need refocusing unless you are doing shots that are wide open? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtdnyc Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 So that the point of focus is exactly where you want it, as in photogrpahy using the visible part of the spectrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 If you want to use the camera as an expensive P&S device shooting everything at infinity and stopping down fast lenses, you need not worry about focus shifts. Older Leica lenses had IR marks on them. The focus shift also would vary according to the thickness of the filter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 <i>If you want to use the camera as an expensive P&S device shooting everything at infinity and stopping down fast lenses, ...</i> <p> ...like <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/f64/hd_f64.htm">these guys</a>... <p><i>...you need not worry about focus shifts.</i> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 Take a look here for a fast lens IR snap: http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=4294.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted May 29, 2007 Author Share Posted May 29, 2007 Vivek, What benefits do you reap from an IR portrait? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 Arthur, Skin tones are different for starters. Background rendition is distinctly different. I am yet to put my Canon 50/0.95 for such an application. Well, here is one sample shot: http://www.photo.net/photo/5900775&size=lg M8 for IR is definitely very versatile. I would hope that you would experiment with your fast lenses at open apertures and at closer ranges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/195/520006079_148b7a20bb_o.jpg" width="900" height="600" alt="" /></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 Oops. Thought it was a W/NW IR thread. Please ignore or delete my last post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted May 29, 2007 Author Share Posted May 29, 2007 >M8 for IR is definitely very versatile. I would hope that you would experiment with your fast lenses at open apertures and at closer ranges. Thanks, Vivek, for the info. Trevor, Very cool effects! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now