Jump to content

Recommended Posts

<p>Here's what I think I know:</p>

<p>The DX has a barrel holding the glass elements that extends further back into the camera than we see for most M42 lenses. This was OK for the early Yashica SLR designs, but the rear of the barrel could block the path of the reflex mirror in later Yashica SLR's and in non-Yashica M42 mount SLR's or digital SLR's. The newer DS optical design kept that barrel clear of all M42 mount camera mirrors.<br>

In addition, the DS lens has enough radioactive thorium oxide in some of its glass elements to yellow the glass over time. It's like a similar situation with the Asahi Super (and Super Multi-Coated) Takumar 50mm/1.4 lens. There are forms of UV exposure that remove the yellow.</p>

<p>Also, the DX has a tab to switch between manual and automatic aperture operation, while the DS does not.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I don't really know. I suspect the coatings are different. I've read the DS coatings were Tomioka before Yashica made the Zeiss C/Y lenses under contract . So The DS lenses were quasi Tomioka lenses in C/Y mount as sopposed to the ML lenses. Where exactly the DX lenses fit I suspect is an improved coating and may represent either the same lenses or those made after Tomioka was consumed by Yashica, which itself was consumed by Kyocera</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...