howard b. schwartz Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 i just found a terrific piece of equipement for leveling large format cameras. please check out the url: thelevelhead.com. the item is expensive, but works great. just to save all the email, this is an unsolicited announcement for a piece of equipement that i have always needed. leveling my camera accurately was very difficult for me. hope this may useful to some of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fowler Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 $500.00 is a bit much for something that's going to sit on top of a tripod head. I've been using a $6.00 Stanley torpedo level for years - not a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fix_r._fiend Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 Second the torpedo level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 You all obviously did not check the url. This is not a level, but a presision device to fine tune the leveling of a camera. This might be a real help to a well healed architectural photographer. Must frustrate MD who gives advice and people won`t listen, yet they come back with the same problem. Take all the medicine even if you feel better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__hank_boneroneo1 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 <<This is not a level,>> That's the joy of it. After you spend $500 on a hinge, you still have to go buy a level! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don_miller2 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 How about the Gitzo Leveling Base for 3, 4 and 5 series Tripods. 150 bucks. Takes about five seconds with one hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre_noble4 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 Be patient. The kind but overworked Doc will be selling his soon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorge_gasteazoro4 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 I dont know, it seems rather cumbersome to me. Nothing my 3 way pan head cannot do, and it seems you need to take the same amount of time fiddling with this gizmo as you would need with a 3 way head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_senesac Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 Obviously a precise way to vernier adjust this ADAPTOR to be level but that still depends on having sensors in one's camera one is adjusting to level. In the case of my wooden field camera, I have an integrated spirit level on the rear stage horizontal, vertical, and rear to forward axis. For whatever reason when the bubles are all centered, I found framing not quite balanced to gravity vertical. I seem to have over long years of tripod work developed an ability to usually adjust by eye well so just do so. Regardless sometimes weird terrain like slightly tilting horizons tends to want to trick one's eye. Two other problems with adaptors like the above is for field use it adds more weight to carry and two the more complicated one's tripod head, the more likely it decreases stability and the effects of vibration. For years I've been squeeking out from our vast ignored mass of peon users that camera manufacturers ought to design into cameras in general an integrated micro sensor chip that provide on the viewing screen or with LF below ones groundglass an indication of perfect levelness. If the camera manufacturers simply mentioned that they would like to have such a device, IC designers would quickly jump on the task and make some cheap comodity device to implement such. Some day the rest of us will be squeeking "why couldn't one of the manufacturers have the creativity to have innovated this years ago?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan_mcintosh Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 With all those extra parts that move on it, you are SURE to have less stability with your camera. Also, That "Level Head" is not needed if you know how to properly possition your camera and use your camera movements in relationship with your current tripod movements. Getting the EXACT measurement in degrees of how your camera in place is not needed also. All you need to do is be able to compose your images properly on the ground glass, if you have mastered that...there is no need for this nonsense equiptment. Ryan McIntosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uli_mayer Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 I should get one for fine-adjusting my top level monopod. Cheers. Uli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 Overpriced overkill for the overly rich and neurotic. A Bogen 3416 or 3502 will do the job for a fraction of the price. FWIW, I've used a Bogen 3115 (roughly equivalent to the 3502, replaced by it in the catalog) under the pan/tilt head since the late '80s. Solves the problem, if the problem is making the pan axis vertical = making the base of the pan/tilt head level. Putting a pan/tilt head with built-in levels on top of the 3115 makes it easy to level the camera AFTER the pan axis has been made vertical. So does putting a cheap little 2-axis level as bought in a hardware store on top of the camera on top of a pan/tilt head on top of a leveling ball. Cheers, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george_stewart1 Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 I had an opportunity to play with one of these last year and it is a fantastic device. Is it needed? No. It's a luxury device that makes fine adjustments a pleasure. I placed an order for one but after more than six months of waiting, I just canceled it - too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fowler Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 <i>"You all obviously did not check the url. This is not a level, but a presision device to fine tune the leveling of a camera. This might be a real help to a well healed architectural photographer."</i><p> Yes, I did look at the url. I should have said "I'm quite happy with a Bogen 3047 3-way head and a torpedo level."<p>While it looks like a nicely machined part, I just don't see the need to spend $500 for something that is going between my tripod head and camera. I shoot architectural subjects just fine with a 3-way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pvp Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 P.T. Barnum was right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_smith6 Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 I gave up leveling the cameras some time ago after hearing of Fred Picker chainsawing trees that were in the way of his view. I have a buddy bring along his D9 Caterpillar & level the view & horizon. Costs a bit more sure, but it works well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w_t1 Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 what's with the MD tag anyway? I could see some relevance if you posted a message about fiber optic camera for endoscopy, etc... I guess HOward doesn't have CDS (cheap doctor syndrome) there are a lots of us here that are licensed professionals, but the title is not needed... I'm here to chat about photography, not genital warts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tito sobrinho Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 Doc, you did expend a lot of money on this contraption. What I use is the Bogen 3047 head+ a little torpedo level that a friend gave me. It came with a grandfather clock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 Tito, all kidding aside, when you can get around to it and find one at a low enough price, get a 3115 (my second one cost only $10) or a 3502 and put it under your 3047. I use a 3115 under my 3047 and 3063 and wouldn't do without. The big advantage of leveling the head rather than just the camera is that when the pan axis is vertical panning won't make the horizon move. This is essential in cinematography, useful in still photography, because it reduces the need to adjust again. Cheers, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkka Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 It would have been so easy to machine a bubble level at the top of that device. At least the buyers would save the expense to get that $5 torpedo level as well. Does it have any way to lock the adjustment rings? When I get the camera level, I like to tighten all the tripod/camera screws so that they don't crawl when changing film holders and fumbling with the dark cloth. For such a 'perfect' device it seems to have quite obvious shortcomings, even apart from the price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victor_loverro Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 I use mostly wooden field cameras and I doubt that many of this type of camera has a back or lens board that is exactly 90 degrees to the base. It always seems better to me to use a small torpedo level to check the back, and lens when necessary. If you only level the base how do you know the back is plumb and level? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fowler Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 <i>"If you only level the base how do you know the back is plumb and level?"</i><p>You don't.<p>I have a couple of leveling devices I keep in my equipment cases - a torpedo level, a small combination square, and a couple small circular bubble levels. My 3036 sticks has a small bubble level on it which gets me in the ball park, but I make final adjustments at the camera itself - if I'm being anal about being level that is. Truth be told, for most of my work these days (portraiture), I'm tilting the camera here and there anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tito sobrinho Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 "after hearing of Fred Picker chainsawing trees that were in the way of his view" Daniel Smith. You heard wrong! Since it is the second time I've read you stating this, clarification is needed. What he did was to cut some grass bushes that were on his foreground. Maybe wrong, but those were not trees, and there is no Zone VI Chainsaw. Please, get your facts straight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james___ Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 I never could figure out why you need to level a view camera. A quick look at the ground glass is all you need. Does the view and aspect change that much once you pull the trigger? Does the ground glass lie? Can you not see the horizon on the glass? Even $6 at Home Cheapo seems a bit high compared to the free look you get from the glass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm1 Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 James, I find it easier to use a leveling ball, especially when the horizon really is aslant. Cheers, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now