Jump to content

Lenses for Nikon Rangefinder Cameras.


Recommended Posts

To me, the best thing about Leica Rangefinders, and other cameras that use LTM are the many lenses available to them.<p>

 

But I like Nikon RF's. I like the Nikkor 5cm F1.4 and 5cm F2, but wanted more of a choice. Planar formula lenses

for the Nikon are rare and expensive. The 50mm F1.4 Olympic Nikkor and 50mm Millenium Nikkor are first rate

lenses, just expensive. The Helios 103 and Menopta 53/1.8 are very good lenses, classic Planar 1-2-2-1 formula,

and are cheap at ~$20 each. But they are made for the Contax standard. <p>

 

I've found two ways to adapt them for Nikon:. <p>

1) undo the set screws, back out 1/2 turn (0.5mm), tighten set screws. Done. That optimizes for close-up and

wide-open, infinity good at ~F2.8.<p>

2) for early Helios-103's, 1981~1983, you can take out the rear module and take about 0.4mm off of the rear

stand-off shim. That reduces the Focal Length.<p>

 

All pictures taken with the Nikon Rangefinders<p>

 

Menopta Wide-Open at F1.8, on the Nikon S3 using method 1.<p>

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=552> </center>

 

Tight Crop of above:<p>

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=553> </center>

 

Another Menopta, wide-open:<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=546> </center>

 

Outside, wide-open<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=542> </center>

 

 

Helios-103, method 1, F4 on the S3:<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=547> </center>

 

Helios-103, Wide-Open, method 2, Focal Length Modified to Nikon Standard.<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=554> </center>

 

Same lens, at F4, for Tonal Range.<p>

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=555> </center>

 

Menopta, method 1, wide-open at F1.8:<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=550> </center>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=551> </center>

 

Compared to my "Millenium Nikkor 50mm F1.4 on the S3, at F1.8:<p>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=556> </center>

 

<center> <img src=http://camwk.com/picture.php?albumid=52&pictureid=557> </center>

 

That is the $15 lens vs the $1000 lens. I use both.<p>

 

Album of test shots is here:<p>

 

http://camwk.com/album.php?albumid=52

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next up will be my 50mm F1.5 Nokton on the S2. The 1950s Voigtlander Prominent Nokton...

 

I'll probably break down and get the Asph Nokton in S-Mount. It and the 5cm F1.1 Nikkor-N are the only 50s that use the external mount. Unless a 50/1.1 Super-Nokton comes out in S-Mount...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I know that Nikkor lenses marked with a "C" work on Contax-mount RFs. But my question, suggested by the initial post, is this: Is it possible to adjust the regular Nikon RF lenses to focus properly on Contaxes?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken: The S3 has a Single Shutter Dial that does not rotate, and the finder has brightlines for 35/50/105 focal length. The finder flares more than the S2. The S2 is the best Nikon RF for use with a 50mm lens. I have some as well.

 

Daniel: If you reduce the shim by ~0.5mm on the Nikkor 5cm F1.4 and F2 lenses, they will focus better on a Contax.You can also do this trick with other Nikkor lenses. I did things the "other way around" and made a Nikon S2 body work with all of my Contax lenses. I moved the entire helical out 0.5mm and then calibrated the RF to agree with an unmodified 50mm F1.5 Sonnar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Here is a shot with a 5cm F2 Nikkor LTM that scale focuses to 18" used on an Eposn RD-1:<br>

<br /> It is the same lens optically that is the 5cm F2 for Nikon RF; a decent performer; once dirt cheap.<br>

This LTM Nikkor 5cm F2 was about 9 dollars via Ebay; listed as an enlarging lens.<br>

<br /> 9 bucks is what a nikon RF or LTM 5cm F2 sold for used in 1969 at a NYC dealer; worth say 4 bucks as a trade; IF one begged hard enough.</p>

<p>Here I cheated abit; the lens is stopped down several stops.</p>

<p><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/Images%20of%20cameras/RETINAIIATYPE016KATRINA01.jpg?t=1243130115" alt="" width="700" height="542" /></p>

<p><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/Images%20of%20cameras/RETINAIIATYPE016KATRINA01crop.jpg?t=1243130293" alt="" width="395" height="631" /></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>What about infinty focus? When you change the close up focus it throws off the infinity setting.</p>

<p>The best solution is to get a Contax IIa body to use with your Nikon. That's what I did. I can use any lens in the Contax/Nikon mount.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>...I'd always heard rumors that Kodak's Retina R+D team struggled diligently to produce the first "true" underwater camera (for which no housing is needed), and that when this camera finally hit the market and it still wasn't right...kodak then launched a secret campaign to repurchase (at exorbitant prices) all of the failed examples - which were then destroyed in hopes that the public would never know... Thank you, Kelly, for finally providing us with irrefutable proof of this failed enterprise! : )</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anthony, the actual difference in the throw of the helical is 0.1mm. Most of the difference between Nikon and Contax is where the lens sits on it. SO: optimize for close up and wide-open, infinity is completely covered by F2.8. With the Sonnar, the focus shift toward infinity helps.

 

I prefer the 1x viewfinder of the Nikon over my Contax II and Contax IIIa, especially with the faster lenses. That was the driver to modifying lenses for the Nikon.

 

Kelly- That Retina IIa is a mess. Was that an Ebay "EX" grade? I bought an SLR from Ebay with an "I know nothing about cameras, but I can see no problem that it will not work perfectly". It had been in a fire and the insides were melted, but the outside was not bad. I also remember the days when this stuff was cheap. How about a Nikon M with 5cm F1.4 for $30 or a Leica III with Summar for $15? I jumped on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a Contax already, and Nikkor RF lenses- it makes real sense to shim them for the Contax. If I convert one of my lenses for the Contax, I'll post the procedures and the results. The focus shift on the Sonnar is toward infinity as you stop down. That helps when converting a Zeiss lens to the Nikon. With the Nikon lens converted to a Contax, it works against you.

 

Currently, I have a 1955 KMZ J-3 on the Contax II and it gives first rate performance. "Jupiters on my Contax" can be another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><em>"To me, the best thing about Leica Rangefinders, and other cameras that use LTM are the many lenses available to them. But I like Nikon RF's. I like the Nikkor 5cm F1.4 and 5cm F2, but wanted more of a choice."</em></p>

<p>The lens selection is the big hangup for me on Nikon RF stuff. I can get every lens that Nikkor made for its RF in LTM. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><em>"The lens selection is the big hangup for me on Nikon RF stuff. I can get every lens that Nikkor made for its RF in LTM"</em></p>

<p>With one notable exception (actually two) - the Millennium (and Olympic) Nikkor-S 50mm f1.4.<br>

I guess we can also include the modern multicoated version of the W-Nikkor 3.5cm F1.8 as well, as it was only sold as part of the SP Limited Edition kit.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...