glenbarrington Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Somehow, I've got a couple weddings lined up for this summer even though I am not a professional and did not seek this work out. Also I have come into some extra money that I thought I'd buy a second Olympus 4/3s body and an additional lens. It's been 30 years since I last shot a wedding and then I used a Mamiya C330 (I was young and had a strong back!). I'm fairly certain, if I wanted to, I could book quite a few weddings each year and I am seriously thinking about it. Currently, I am using the Oly 2 lens kit of a 14 - 45 mm (35 mm equiv 28 - 90 mm) and the 40 - 150 mm lens (35 mm equiv 80 - 300mm). I am reasonably comfortable that the image quality of these lenses will be up to the task though they aren't very fast lenses. For a new lens, I'm torn between the higher IQ of the 14 - 54 mm 35 mm equiv (28 - 108 mm) Zuiko which will duplicate the shorter kit lens, or the also higher quality 11 - 22 mm Zuiko (35mm equiv of 22 - 44mm). The 11 - 22 mm Zuiko is about $250 USD more than the 14 - 54. Both will be a full stop faster than the kit lenses. My questions are these. 1) How useful overall would the extra wide angle be in a wedding situation? 2) Would you rather have a higher quality (and faster) modest WA to short tele or would you feel that a medium WA to almost normal would be a better addition to the lens mix? I'd like to do as good a job as possible for these kids, but I'm just not certain which new lens would be a more cost effective choice. I'm comfortable that my other equipment needs have been met. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medina photography cherry Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Why not get 2 fast primes? Does Olympus have any? I would get a wide prime and a medium tele prime. That should be the same cost as a large ap zoom. That is what I would do. You are going to need faster lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 I agree with Robert. A couple of primes is probably faster to handle, and once you "get to know" their coverage you soon find yourself knowing exactly where to stand and what each lens covers ~ much faster than twiddling with a zoom contol for every shot. Perhaps a 28 and an 85? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedding-photography-denver Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Aren't they about to release a 14-35/2 or something? That would be a nice one to have (28-70 equiv.) Otherwise, using a second body, two primes as Robert and Al both say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now