bruno_menilli Posted October 3, 2002 Share Posted October 3, 2002 It has been stated for so long that the name Leica comes from LEItz CAmera, but does it? I've recently read a very convincing article that says something else. Leitz always had wierd codings for their early equipment, up to about the 50,s . Names such as Mooly are fairly well known. The Leitz A type camera had the coding Leane, and a kit of that camera with lens , case and cassettes had the code LEICA applied!, and it appears the name stuck and was used as a generic term for Leitz's cameras. Is this true? Regards Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_collier2 Posted October 3, 2002 Share Posted October 3, 2002 The original plan was to call it the Leca. There is some early promotional material had been produced*. Apparently Leca was trademarked/copyrighted** by someone else so they switched it to Leica. Code word "LEICA" (1925) was for camera ands three magazines in a brown leather bag with shoulder strap and handle*. *Source: Laney ** I remember reading it but I cannot remmeber where! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Here is a translation of part of Günter Osterloh's book (4th edition, 1996, page 239; 5th edition, 2002, page 317; both in German): <p>[... in 1924/25 the tradename Leica had been applied for.] That first application attempt, was well as the second one (1930) were however refused. The third application finally got the registration through in 1937 that they wanted, and thus the the patented tradename too. This newly coined word, which soon became known worldwide and which was easy to pronounce in any language, was derived from the concept <b>Lei</b>tz-<b>Ca</b>mera. <p>More on the fifth edition maybe later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno_menilli Posted October 4, 2002 Author Share Posted October 4, 2002 Thanks for your replies, but Michael, the use of the word Leica as a product code(in 1925 ) for the A camera etc, is a fact, and aren't those codes trademarked? I would have thought that Leitz would already have the 'rights' to the use of the name, and therefore why the problem with registration? Many thanks Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted October 6, 2002 Share Posted October 6, 2002 Bruno, the use of the word Leica as a product code was not trademarked. I asked our outstanding Leica Information Service (by e-mail) about this, and got an instant reply. They informed me that the following was mentioned in a (German) book now out of print. Here's my English translation: After Leitz had decided on a serial production, they began with their manufacture of assembly tools, and a year after that, their model I was on the market. The first cameras which left the plant had the name of the manufacturer. As we now know, the name "Lilliput", which Barnack had desired, could not be used because it had already been taken over by Ernemann. Leitz itself suggested the name "Barnack-Kamera", but Barnack was not well known outside of Wetzlar, and was, moreover, in some languages hard to pronounce. Thereafter, the name "Leca" was discussed. Now, although this name appeared to be easy to pronounce in all languages, it still somehow lacked a nice sound, pleasing to the ear. Apart from that, the name Leca was just too similar to that of Krauss's (another manufacturer's) camera "EKA" -- above all in French, where after the addition of their definite article you'd now have "l'EKA". Via insertion of the letter "i" the name "Leica" was finally "found". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now