Hi everybody, I have a complete Leica set of prime lenses (28, 50, 90 mm) which I currently use on a R4S. 20 year old equipment, but still very good. Iﾒm used to print my pics by myself in my b&w darkroom. Iﾒm thinking about buying a Canon system (for autofocus reason and compatibility with digital). The quality of the pics is very important for me and therefore I am considering to buy Canon L prime lenses (which, I think, are the only Canon lenses which wonﾒt be completely blown out of the water by Leica quality). My question is: prime Canon L lenses are at least as good as Leica 20 year old primes? What about other Canon prime lenses (not L series)? Are there some resolution test for comparing such lenses? In your opinion, which size the pictures should have for noticing some differences between the lenses? Will I be disappointed by prints taken out of L canon lenses (considering that in my entire ﾓphotographyﾔ life, I just have used Leica lenses)? Thanks for your comments PS I'm thinking about posting the same message on Canon Eos forum, just to know what Canon people think.