Tony Rowlett Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 In another harebrained attempt at using the Leica M8 for something other than that for which it was designed, I attached a Visiflex II with Leitz 90/2.8 Elmarit head from 1959 using a universal focusing mount (#16464K) to attempt some macro work. The viewfinder housing won't fit on the Visiflex due to the taller-than-traditional-M dimension of the camera, so I used a loupe instead to gain focus. These are chunks of aluminum turned on a small metal lathe that might've eventually become chess set pieces but for now make interesting photographic subjects. <center> <a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/8300503"><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/8300503-sm.jpg"></a> <br>(click image for larger version) </center> <p> I didn't bother removing orange gels from the flashes thus the brass color of the aluminum. The in-focus piece is a tad taller than 1 inch. <p> Lighting: Vivitar 285HV camera left, 1/16th power, 3/4 CTO gel, through a sheet of tracing paper; Nikon SB-26 camera right, 1/32 power, full CTO gel, through a sheet of tracing paper, a setup very similar to <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-assignment-shoot-your-shiny-new.html">this Strobist "On Assignment" post</a>. <p> <b>Forum maintenance question:</b> We have the category "Leica in a Digital World" and a "Leica M" category, but where do Leica M8 posts belong? Should we have a dedicated category for those? Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I like how you keep finding ways to push the M8, Tony. I'm still messing around with the pinhole. I haven't got one to try, but would hope the Viso III would clear the M8 dimensions ok. Add a 65mm macro and you'd have a pretty nice 87mm (effective) macro set up. BTW, don't forget the existing M Digital category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Sorry - I meant "Leica Digital" category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Rowlett Posted November 26, 2008 Author Share Posted November 26, 2008 Ah, thanks, Ken. That would've been a better category for this post, I guess. I think we almost have too many categories. Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 The Panasonic G1 obviates the use of visoflex and related (reflex) accessories. There is a lot of potential to use Leica lenses (extension, bellows) for close-ups, macros (even the dedicated Leica macro lenses like the Summars, Milars and the Photars). BTW, whether the M8 was designed for non-close-up work or not, the Visoflexes were certainly made for such work! :) Did you try the Viso III? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgpinc Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Ken, Are you still gainfully employed or are you happily retired out there in the parallel universe of Brentwood? I'm still contracting mainframe IT but not for much longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Rowlett Posted November 26, 2008 Author Share Posted November 26, 2008 I don't have a Viso III, but supposedly all I'd need for my Viso II is that one finder that sticks straight up (hard to find and/or expensive). That might even allow me to focus without having to remove the pocket wizard I'm using for the speed lights. About 80% of my photographic objectives the M8 fits perfectly. The problem is, 10% of what I want to do is macro work, the other 10% is some long focus stuff. (*ahem* I know what you're thinking... please don't say it... not within ear-shot of my wife...) By the way, this morning, rummaging through my rings/adapters/extensions drawer, I was able to mount a Canon FD mount 200/f4 onto the M8, or the Visi if I wanted an actual preview. Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Tony - that's the "simple" or "chimney" magnifier. That would do the trick alright - although the image is reversed if that doesn't bother you. Next time I'm in Camera West I'll take a look at the fit of the Viso III and check the availability of the chimney magnifier for the Viso II. Hi, Gil. Still working in Walnut Creek and living in Clayton. My retirement dreams have been knocked back twice now - first by the .com bust, now this mess. Still doing infrastructure, mainframe and distributed. I have to to feed my gear habit somehow. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Rowlett Posted November 26, 2008 Author Share Posted November 26, 2008 That would be great, Ken, thanks. Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Ken beat me to it. There are two possibilities, the one mentioned by you, Tony, is the rare type. Cheaper to get a Viso III! The other possibility is the more readily available chimney (although, as Ken wonders, it may not fit). BTW, take a look here ( I put in a Milar shot): http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4194 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 The 5x chimney magnifier is coded OTVXO and/or 16461. It fits both the Viso II and III. One sold on eBay recently for $115. I'll let you know if I find one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Rowlett Posted November 27, 2008 Author Share Posted November 27, 2008 Thanks, Ken! I'd previously seen one or two sell for somewhat more than that, so your report is good news. I'll keep an eye out myself. Thanks for looking! Now, of course, Vivek's got me enthused about a III ! Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now