Jump to content

Late Summicron-M35/2 vs. Summicron-M35/2 ASPH


nhp

Recommended Posts

Thanks for helpful advice about my prior question. I am considering to get a 35mm for my M6ttl. Is there any difference between Late Summicron-M35/2 and Summicron-M35/2 ASPH? As far as I know, optical quality of Summicron-M 35/2 ASPH is better than late 35/2. Is it really noticeable? Also, the price of Summicron-M 35/2 ASPH is higher than late 35/2, but the size of Late Summicron-M35/2 is more compact. Which model is more desirable in aspect of performance, price and size? Please give me a advice for this. Thanks... http://welcome.to/studionaki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you mostly shoot at f4 and lower with only an occasional shot

or two t f2 then the latest 35/2 pre-asph is a wonderful lens. It

really shines in the f5.6 to f11 range where it is justifably known

as the King of Bokeh. The 35/2 Asph is significantly sharper and

has reduced vignetting at F2, so, if you shoot mostly wide open, it

would be a better choice. I traded my 35/2 latest pre-asph in for a

35/1.4 Asph and, though I notice the slightly harsher bokeh in the

middle apertures, I have been delighted! A number of people

traded up to the 35/2 Asph when it first came out but were

dissatisfied with its middle aperture performance and went back

to the latest pre-asph version. Here is a URL for a more

technical comparison:

 

<p>

 

<a

href="http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/mseries/testm/m2-35.htm

l">

http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/mseries/testm/m2-35.html</a>

 

<p>

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHP,

 

<p>

 

I have used the non-aspheric lens for many years, and considered

replacing it upon the introduction of the latest model. I borrowed

an aspheric version and tested them side by side.

 

<p>

 

At the widest apertures, yes the sharpness is a bit better with the

aspheric model. however, the overall picture (to me) looks better

with the older lens. I don't want to get all philosophical about

Bokeh, but I do believe that it is important. I like the out of

focus rendering from the non-aspheric better. The effect looks so

much better, that I have started using my lens wide open, even when

the light allows for a more stopped down exposure. Depending on the

subject's distance from the background, the effect almost can look

like a cut-out pasted on a nice blur.

 

<p>

 

When using a 35mm lens, you can never get the selective focus of a

90mm lens, so I have found in the f2.8-f4.0 range, there is enough

sharpness throughout the shot, that the intended effect is not

clear... it just looks like a soft picture. So I shoot wide open for

nice subject / background separation... or I stop down and use

hyperfocal distance. If the new model is better wide open as far as

sharpness, the older Pre-aspheric is better IMHO for pictorial

photography. Additionally, the physical size of the older lens, has

endeared itself to me as making a great combo for portability...

almost pocket sized without the hood.

 

<p>

 

After comparing, I stayed with my older lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice. Is there anyone who knows the physical size

in "mm" of both 35/2 & 35/2asph lens? I want to know the length

difference in millimeter scale between thses two lens when they are

attached on M6 body. Also, Could you tell me about where I can get

the late 35/2 model and the resonable price range of late 35/2 chrome

model in Mint or New condition? Please let me know, Thanks again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHP,

 

<p>

 

The older pre-Aspheic is 26mm from flange, while the newer model is

34.5mm.

 

<p>

 

I don't know about the best source for used gear, I use Tamarkin,

simply based on some very good experiences from them.

 

<p>

 

Please note, the weight of the Chrome lenses are heavier than the

black models... if this is important to you. For example, the

aspheric 35mm Summicrons are 255g for the black and 340g for the

chrome. the pre-aspheric lenses have a similer differential, but I

only know the weight for the black one which is 190g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were you (which of course I'm not), I would buy a brand-spanking

new 35/2 ASPH for around $1200.00 or so (grey) at a good trusty place

like Delta Int. or somewhere like that. Ummmm, something about a new

lens..no one else's rub marks, lint or drool on it, that new-lens

smell and all that. We all know it's a fab. piece of work. It's

total state of the art and only a few hundred more than a used pre-

ASPH... Just my 9 cents. Good luck in your quest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...