blakley Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 I attended my 30th High School reunion this weekend. While the reunion was being planned, I'd volunteered tophotograph my classmates because I think they're interesting people and deserve to be remembered by more than asingle panoramic photo. As the date approached, Polaroid announced that they were getting out of the instantfilm business. My class was born (mostly) in 1960; Polaroid introduced pack film in 1963. So we're the kids inthe early Polaroid photos; we're also maybe last generation which thinks of photographs as physical objectsrather than "images" - our kids won't understand why we answered "the pictures" when asked what we'd save firstin a house fire (they know the photo.net and flickr databases aren't harmed when a house burns).<p>After thinking about it for a while, I ordered some of the last stock of 4x5 type 56 (100 ISO sepia) Polaroidfilm, and took it, along with my 4x5 monorail camera and an 11" f/4 Wollensak Verito variable soft-focus lens ina Studio shutter to the reunion. <p>At the reunion I told my classmates about the discontinuation of Polaroid, and offered to take a Polaroid photoof anyone who wanted one - probably as the last Polaroid photo they'd ever get of themselves.<p>The idea was a hit, and I took 70 photos in a little over 2 hours; I shot them at f/8 (to keep a littlesoft-focus effect) and at shutter speeds varying between about half a second and about three seconds, dependingon subject and my mood and coordination. I rephotographed the polaroids with a Leica M8 and 50mm f/2 CollapsibleSummicron-M lens fitted into a BOWUM copystand, and gave the originals to the subjects. The digital photos showvarious artifacts associated with my not having time to clean the glass I was using to keep the photos flat, andwith reflections and shadows arising from my use of room light instead of copystand lights to illuminate thePolaroids. But I like the irony of the digital versions being grubbier than the originals - it makes them alittle more "thing-like". I also altered the color of the digital copies of the photos to make the sepia toneless pronounced than it is in type 56 film in the real world.<p>Clicking the picture below takes you to the whole set at flickr; if you want to see a slideshow on black there'sa "slideshow" button at upper right when you're looking at the set.<p><center><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/blakley/sets/72157606407621272/" rel="nofollow"><imgsrc="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3028/2708424181_18b787e44d.jpg"></a></center><p>I learned a few things doing this; first, low light is good when you're using a Studio shutter - it makesexposure times longer so the variability introduced by manually opening and closing the shutter while countingseconds is less critical. Second, a ballhead is the WRONG support for a monorail camera. I'll use my three-axishead next time. In the event, I mostly resorted to picking the camera and tripod up and moving it around as arigid mass. Third, I need a tripod whose legs have a better intermediate spread setting. The narrow spread wastoo narrow, and the wide spread was too low. Fourth, Polaroid is INCREDIBLY efficient. I could not have taken apicture every 2 minutes with 4x5 film without a seriously large collection of film holders, and the processingwould have taken forever. Neither digital nor film is really an adequate replacement for Polaroid. Fifth, (nota new lesson but a reminder) the Verito is a wonderful lens. Sixth, rephotographing is an art unto itself, andone I'm not very good at.<p>But even with all these lessons, I'm extremely happy with the results. I hope you like them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_503771 Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 That's a pretty remarkable piece of work! Well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted July 28, 2008 Author Share Posted July 28, 2008 I note that the moderator has changed the title of the thread; that's fine, but note that I titled the project "The Last Polaroid" anticipating that for each subject that's what it would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now