jo7hs2 Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 <p>Several years ago I printed a set of RGB patterns on some overhead projector transparencies, mostly as a joke, to see if I could maybe get a color image out of black and white film, in the vein of Autochrome or Dufaycolor, only a lot less technically developed. I finally got around to running one over a sheet of ordinary black and white film (Arista EDU, 100 speed, if it matters) during some camera testing a few weeks back, and sent it in with my other film for processing.</p> <p><br /> The process was simple, a basic 2x2 RGGB pattern copy-pasted until coverage over a full 4x5 sheet was accomplished, then printed onto the overhead projector transparencies. The pattern included registration marks for alignment. The overhead projector transparencies were then cut to the size of a 4x5 sheet of film, and placed facing towards the lens over the film in a standard film holder. Much cursing ensued during the placement of the film. Exposure was slightly extended to account for shooting through the overhead projector transparency.</p> <p><br /> I scanned the negative with the overhead projector transparency facing the scanner optics. The registration marks turned out to be useless, as the cutting I did rendered the overhead projector transparency too large to fit in my scanner template for 4x5 properly alongside the 4x5 sheet film. I scanned this as a color negative, which my scanner software automatically inverted. I think due to the lack of a color cast in this film, the scan came out too red. I dropped the red level ONLY but a few notches, and I got the image below.</p> <p><br /> Did that actually work? I have no clue. In real life, the blankets are blue, the dog is brown and white, and his eyes are brown. I see blue blankets, a marginally brownish dog, and maybe a brown eye? But I strongly suspect that is just processing artifacts. I'll try it a few more times with less blue and see what happens, but I think I'm just seeing things on this one. Anybody wanna try it and confirm I'm nuts? ;)</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 <p>Well this is interesting.</p> <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jo7hs2 Posted October 17, 2012 Author Share Posted October 17, 2012 Huh. That looks a little more like color and a little less like random "noise" from the "filter." Thanks for tweaking that a bit. Now I really do need to try some more tests, just to satisfy my curiosity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lwg Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 <p>Interesting idea. For your next shot try shooting a color checker so you can see if it's working at all.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 <p>You need a positive print to make this work. So make a contact print of the negative on another sheet of film, process that, and then sandwich with the color grid transparency. Scan as a positive.<br> Alternately, you can sandwich the negative with a grid of Cyan, Yellow, and Magenta squares. Remember that those are the colors of the dyes in color negatives. (In slides as well.)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now