harry_akiyoshi Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 I have an FA with a K2 screen. I was wondering how much of an improvement the newer screens (released with the FM3a) are over the original one that came with the FA. Also, I'm mainly interested in quick focusing with telephotos -- is a b-type plain matte screen better for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_h._hartman Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 Focusing might be more difficult with very fast lenses. DOF might not be quite as easy to judge. If the K3, B3 and E3 screens are similar to F3 Red-Dot screens and K2, B2 and E2 screen are half way between the Red-Dot(s) and the older F, F2 and (F3 non-Red-Dot) screens then maybe they are a best compromise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry_akiyoshi Posted May 13, 2004 Author Share Posted May 13, 2004 I don't know that the screens I'm talking about are directly comparable with the F or F3 screens. Those ones are made of glass and have their own little condensor lenses, I think (could be wrong). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dante_stella Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 The brighter the screen, the worse the manual focusing. F3 and F4 screens are completely different from FA/FE2/FM2 screens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_h._hartman Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 The F Series Nikons, F through F5, have an optical acrylic focus screen. The focus screen is paired with an optical glass condenser. There is a thin strip of clear tape that holds the pair together and keeps out dust. Then they are mounted in an aluminum or fiber reinforced polycarbonate frame with four thin steel tabs and screws. The split image rangefinder or micro prism if any and the matte focus surface is located on the bottom of the focus screen and faces the lens. A Fresnel lens is on the top side of the focus screen proper excepting the C and D screens which have no Fresnel. The FM2n and FE2 (and others) use an optical acrylic focus screen. These cameras do not have a condenser. That job is handled by a single Fresnel instead of the Fresnel and condenser pair of the F series. The Fresnel lens is on the bottom of the screen facing the lens and the split image rangefinder if any and matte focus surface is on the top. Although there are differences the similarity lies in the optical performance of the focus surface of the optical acrylic focus seen. Some screens have a smoother matte surface and some course. The new screens are brighter and smoother and older darker and course. Now whether these screens are the directly comparable or not I�ve done it. I�ve compared the F2, F3 (Red-Dot), F5, F100 and FE2/FM2n screens and done this quite carefully. What I can say for sure is the FE2 and FM2n are the easiest to focus on the matte surface. The F3 with Red-Dot screen comes second and the F3HP Red-Dot and F5 come next. The optical characteristics of the F3 Red-Dot screen and the F5 are very similar. In some case and with some lenses they are probably brighter than optimum. The F3 beats the F3HP and F5 by having 0.8x finder magnification v. 0.75x for the later. The F100 comes in last due to its lower 0.7x finder magnification. It would be interesting to compare the B2 and B3 or E2 and E3 screens but I don�t have a B3 or E3 screen to compare. The price of doing your own test is about $35.00 by N.Y. prices. Regards, Dave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_tonkin Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Not sure if you're still looking two years on but as I stumbled upon your question about the K3 relative to the K2 screen in my own search for advice on the matter, and the fact someone else has got away with utter dribble about 'the brighter the screen, the worse the manual focusing' I thought I'd add that the K3 screen works very well, is noticeably clearer and therefore gives the impression of being brighter and that focussing is therefore less stressful and quicker too. The black outer circle seems more pronounced than with the K2 but it might be simply in starker contrast now the screen itself is brighter. No exposure adjustment required for the meter, on the FA at least and so presumably for all cameras that it fits. Still hopeful of finding anyone who actually runs this seemingly Mary Celeste-like website so I may change my registered email address Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry_miller5 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Not sure if you're still looking two years on but as I stumbled upon your question about the K3 relative to the K2 screen in my own search for advice on the matter, and the fact someone else has got away with utter dribble about 'the brighter the screen, the worse the manual focusing' I thought I'd add that the K3 screen works very well, is noticeably clearer and therefore gives the impression of being brighter and that focussing is therefore less stressful and quicker too. The black outer circle seems more pronounced than with the K2 but it might be simply in starker contrast now the screen itself is brighter. No exposure adjustment required for the meter, on the FA at least and so presumably for all cameras that it fits. a_tonkin, I totally agree with you regarding brighter screens DO NOT make manual focusing worse. I've got a B3 screen on my FE2 and have no problem with manual focusing. I had a B2 on it and switched. It's perfect!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Garrard Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Nice to know, but is 13 years a record? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now