monochrome11 Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 if you were leaving on a round the world trip tomorrow and could only take one camera with which to document the entire experience, which would it be (weight is a factor as you'll be backpacking the whole way and getting around by foot)... Yashica T4 Super (35 F3.5) Konica Hexar AF (35 F2) Canonet QL17 (40 F1.7) or Yashica Electro 35 GSN (or similar fixed lens RF) Konica Hexar RF (w/ 50 F2) or Leica M3 (w/ 50 F2) others? reasoning would be most helpful... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 A hand-held light meter, a Nikon FM2n body *all works except the light meter if no battery is in the camera* -- and a Nikkor Ais (zoom) lens. Something like the 50-135mm Ais f3.5 Nikkor is built like a rock. But the lens would have to for you to decide on: you are a photographer and know (more than I) what type of images you are into taking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 I'd take the one I'm most comfortable using and gives me the results I wanted. Until now, for travel, that's meant a Mamiya 7, but I think it will be a digital camera in the future. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monochrome11 Posted April 10, 2004 Author Share Posted April 10, 2004 want to avoid SLRs and heavy zooms, as i'll be doing 25-30km of hiking each day... so fixed lense and RF for weight and compact size? also, i own a Yashica T4 Super and that will most probably be joining me (very light, great lens and good meter), so i want another similarly compact and relatively light camera with manual controls for different speed/type of film... i have an old Gossen Sixtar that will also make the journey... so a meterless camera is an option... Konica Hexar AF, faster, sharper lens than the T4 but no manual focus (its a pain in the butt) and though it has aperature priority mode, its not fully manual... Konica Hexar RF is a great alternative, but is battery dependent... leaves me with the M3, legendary reliability and build quality, superb optics (can only afford a normal), the 35mm on the T4 would be wide enough for most situations that a normal lens would not be sufficient for... no batteries to worry about, no meter (add on selenium but i've got the Gossen).... now if i could only justify putting down $1000+ for one when i have a Canonet QL17... only downside to it is that the lense is a little wider than i would like 40mm... the T4 is 35mm and would like to compliment it with something manual and with a 50mm fast lense (min. f2)... i'm babbling now so i will stop here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l_a_k_h_i_n_d_e_r Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Xpan, of course! You get a 35mm camera, and a Panoramic camera! TTL metering, wonderful lens/body/weight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Kodak Retina I; with coated 50mm F3.5 Ektar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Konica Hexar RF For quality, (prefer my M6ttl; have both). D100 for costs, and compromise. Depends how much you have in your pocket. Given a choice, I would take both. In the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_davis2 Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 A TLR of some type. No batteries usually. Big enough negative. Good for cropping or for big enlargements. No extra lenses. Many are fairly light. Can be used handheld at fairly slow shutter speeds [No mirror bouncing]. If you're hauling a flash then a fast sync speed with many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_miles1 Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Twenty years ago, I did a round the world trip while on vacation from work in the Middle East. I carried just my Nikon F3 with a 28mm lens. Left the 50mm and zoom behind. No regrets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 The film thing is an affectation. I've photographed in the jungle and in the desert, in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America. I've been in incredibly poor countries and I've never had a problem carrying batteries, nor has there ever been anywhere I couldn't find camera batteries. I have, on the other hand, run out of film and been completely unable to find what I needed. Which is why I'll probably be traveling with digital in the future... Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markci Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 EOS Elan 7, 24 f/2.8, 35 f/2, 85 1.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred_wayne Posted April 10, 2004 Share Posted April 10, 2004 Nikon F2AS and 35mm f/1.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everitt Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 My trusty Yashicamat and some Tri-X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 Using lots of film on your trip, along with using 'just' a 35mm lens and a 50mm lens -- you will have little difficulty in putting your future guests to sleep when viewing hundreds of images with little variety.... That said, some travel spots 'beg' for a 20mm to 24mm view (the Grand Canyon, for one) and others do well with a telephoto: a view of the Golden Temple in Kyoto, Japan, for another.) And there are flowers, bugs, and all sorts of subjects that are good with a 90mm or 105mm macro lens. Good luck and travel safe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin conville Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 People aren't getting the "no SLR part" apparently. Of the choices you've given I'd certainly go for the Hexar RF. The battery thing means nothing- take extra batteries! I'd choose it because it has a fast and accurate shutter, has great glass, and is an M mount camera. I wouldn't take just one lens however. I'd probably take three- a 24 or 28mm, a 50mm, and a 75 or 90mm. Part of the system rangefinder attraction is the very compact size of the lenses. I have a Contax G2 w/ 28, 45, and 90mm lenses that I bought for lightweight travel myself. This is what I'd choose but wasn't one of your options. I also liked the suggestion of an XPan. With just the 45mm lens you get both a normal lens and a super wide panoramic. Hard to argue w/ that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 I meant batteries in my post a few above. Battery-free cameras offer no real advantages except in Antartica. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 I'll second what Jeff says. It's rarely the batteries, more often the film. Even in someplace stupidly modern like Vienna, where Ilford has taken over the B&W market to the exclusion of Fuji Neopan except at the most well-stocked camera shops. And film with 35mm isn't really a problem either, as long as you are willing to shoot what they have and not say, only Efke 25 or some such. I'd take the Hexar RF and make framing with the 50mm part of your camera challenge for the day. Put fresh batteries in the day you leave and bring one or two more sets. That should last you a year or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 If the reason why you don't want to consider an SLR is purely weight, and if you're willing to carry around a leica (or an Xpan as some people also suggested), you may still want to have a look at a Rebel Ti with a 28-135IS. That's definitely what I would be taking with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncoutts Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 I'd use a Nikon D1X and a 20mm f/2.8 prime, which incidentally is going to be the setup I'll use as I travel around Asia for the next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 If you already have the T4 and you don't want an SLR, consider going wider. The Ricoh GR21 is a tiny point & shoot with a sweet 21mm f/3.5 lens, manual override, and a shot- bracketing mode. Like the T4, it has been discontinued, but only recently, so you should still be able to find new old stock for around $750 somewhere. (B&H has it listed as 'backordered' but who knows if they'll ever get in any more stock.) Alternatively, consider a Bessa R or R2 rangefinder with one of the Voigtlander lenses. A new Bessa R with 21/4 lens goes for around $550 at Cameraquest.com. A new Voigtlander 50/2.5 lens sells for under $300, the 50/1.5 goes for $350 new. (Since you don't seem averse to buying used, more savings are possible if you choose that option.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefoot Posted April 12, 2004 Share Posted April 12, 2004 my advice is to take one camera with one normal lens. you may think by doing this that you will miss some shots but belive me on a rtw trip you will come home with stacks and stacks of images. moreoever any frustration you may feel about not having the right lens will be more than compensated for by 'just being there'. if i were to choose from your list, i'd go for the Hexar RF with 50/2. the next rtw trip i go on, i shall take the G2 + 45/2. have a wonderful time. regards, stuart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted April 12, 2004 Share Posted April 12, 2004 Canonet QL17 GIII and a lot of film. I say this because it's the only one I own out of the bunch listed. Another good choice would be the Olympus Stylus Epic as it is water resistant and has a fast lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suyu1997 Posted April 12, 2004 Share Posted April 12, 2004 I will bring a Canon Rebel 2000 and a 28-135mm IS lens. This cobination is light, covers most of the focal lengths you will need, provide quite good optical performance, and you do not have to bring a tripod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_interlicchio1 Posted April 12, 2004 Share Posted April 12, 2004 FM3A and a 35mm f2 AF lens. The camera is light and tough, and the lens is sharp, relatively fast, and can focus to about 9 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian_morgan Posted April 13, 2004 Share Posted April 13, 2004 I carried a Nikon F4E, 24, 50 and 200 + SB24 flash for a month around Myanmar. Only time it was a problem was on a 30km hike when I had the runs!! if I was doing it again, I'd take my Leica M3, and F100 with 24 and 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now