Jump to content

Just how funky is the Mamiya 645 35mm/3.5 N lens?


Recommended Posts

There have been a couple of reports of soft edges/corners with this

lens. I'm wondering if it would be noticeably worse (at f/5.6, 11 x

14 prints) than, say, the Fuji GS645 60mm I'm using now? Will I be

able to notice the edge/corner softness with a 7x loop on Provia 100F

slides?

 

(That is, I don't mind if I can't make 20x30s: A3 is all I need.)

 

Also, I wonder if recent versions (i.e. purchased new) might be

better than the older (but still N) versions?

 

FWIW, Mamiya Japan says that the new AF version of the lens is

optically the same as the non-AF version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think almost any lens can produce good results when stopped down, but on a

tripod, used with slow film, etc., but this is one of the few that I have used

that couldn't. Soft corners, soft everything, murky contrast, very cool,

greenish color rendition. I bought it 8 years ago, used it for a while, and

thankfully got rid of it. Perhaps my sample was bad, but that's my experience.

It doesn't compare to the Fuji lenses (although there is no Fuji 35mm), which

are excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Soft corners, soft everything, murky contrast, very cool, greenish color rendition"

 

Does this really sound like a lens Mamiya could continue to sell successfully for years? I own the 35 mm and think it's a great lens. Remember, it's a manual focus lens so don't forget your bifocals or you too may get soft everything. I wouldn't hesistate to recommend this lens but like anything else, it can be used imporperly and produce poor results.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...