Jump to content

"I took the plunge" -- two 35 Summilux asph. 'test' shots


Recommended Posts

<p>You took the plunge, Paul, and the water looks fine! It would be interesting to know what aperture you shot each one at, what film you used, and the focus points.</p>

<p>The second shot looks like a more difficult exposure than the first, because of a broader tonal range. On balance, well exposed as it doesn't lose the highlights, and preserves some shadow detail. But it is one of those shots where sometimes it makes sense to let either the highlights or the shadows go. All-in, a good test subject. The first shot doesn't have as broad a tonal range, so seems an easier exposure. </p>

<p>Ya gotta take it out and shoot some rolls, leaving all the other lenses home! :-)</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Kodak 400 Color Print C41 -- I think both exposures 1/125 @ 1:5.6. Also was testing my new VCII little meter I bought from Stephen G. @ Cameraquest. Seems to work fine. Can't wait to get into a closet & shoot B&W @1.4!! By the way, Frederick, did you get my email ?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Paul. Got your message and you have mail.</p>

<p>That little VC Meter II is nice isn't it? I also use it on an M2. The 90mm frame corresponds almost exactly to the meter's field of view. So you can push in the frame selector, select the area you want to meter, and lock the meter at the same time. It's pretty neat.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think you'll love your 'lux. It's a great low/available light lens. Here are some of the shots I've taken with it:<br>

-night shot, aperture wide open<br>

<img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/106/281553216_3fcb44ccd6.jpg" alt="" /><br>

-indoors shot, again, wide open</p>

<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2334/2326109109_7dc369550e.jpg" alt="" /></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Congratulations Paul. You've taken a plunge while I've only taken a dip in comparrison. I've finally landed myself a Summaron f/2.8 for my M2 as you had suggested over a year ago in my thread. Though you did not suggest a goggled M3 version, it's what I ended up with. I had virtually stalked auctions for a year to no avail, but finally landed one that was within my budget. Thanks for the suggestion and your photo's are wonderful as usuall. Regards-Charles</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...