Jump to content

help me decide: canon 7 VS. canon VI-L


mikeivnitsky

Recommended Posts

The VI-L is good with a 35 focal length and best suited for a 50mm focal length. For the 85mm, 100mm and 135mm focal lengths, three very scarce bright-line viewfinders are used. These rise and fall automatically for parallax correction.

 

The Canon 7 is much more convenient with regards to switch between focal lengths. Not only is its viewfinder brighter, but its user selected frame lines are projected not reflected. The frame lines automatically correct for parallax.

 

The VI-L is a better looker of the two. They just don't make cameras like this any more. The 7 on the other hand is the better all around shooter. In short, the Canon 7 is a very practical choice and you won't be chasing difficult to source, read expensive, auxilliary viewfinders.

 

The Canons are very good RF shooters, but an M2 for normal use or an M3 for the 50 and 90 focal lengths are a step up on the food chain.

Best Regards - Andrew in Austin, TX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canon P.

 

The finder's much much better (less squinty) than the VI-L and the body's just as compact.

 

P is better than Leica M3 in every respect except noise (slightly louder due to metal shutter) and finder brightness/frameline clutter (very good nonetheless, 35mm, 50, and 100 bright frames..35 frame is awkward but accurate)

 

7 meters rarely work these days, and they're tough to repair. If yours is dead, don't count on anyone being able to fix it (KEH does sometimes manage, reportedly).

 

I think $320 is pricey for a VI-L, no matter what condition, but if the meter on the 7 actually works accurately $250 may be a bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...