Jump to content

Glossy or matte prints?


dirk_dom1

Recommended Posts

<p>Hi.<br>

I own a Fuji GX 617 and a Mamiya C330, and I shoot Velvia with it. From a 6 x 17 slide I got a 7 foot print made, and I got some 24 inch prints made from the 6 x 6 slides. I got them printed on a lambda printer and mounted with matte finish, and they look very good. But I'm wondering if they might look better glossy. I didn't get them mounted glossy because I was afraid of strong reflections.<br>

Are there rules that say when you should prefer glossy to matte, and what is most used in exhibitions?<br>

Thank you,</p>

<p>Dirk.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Reflections with a print that large could definitely be a problem. Most galleries do know how to handle lighting to minimize it, however. Most of the prints I see in exhibitions are either on glossy or semi-glossy paper (either true silver halide or inkjet printed). Glossy and to a lesser extent, semi-glossy will give you deeper blacks and better contrast. With the greater contrast will also some a slight increase in <em>apparent </em>sharpness.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Don't know if this will help you or not, but I base the glossy / matte decision on the content of the photo. For portraits, or anything that predominately has people as the subject, I much prefer matte. Glossy just plain looks all wrong to me with any "people picture". For "most" anything else, glossy is preferred. I certainly would want glossy for say a night cityscape scene, but might actually prefer matte for a very "soft" pastoral scene where I do not want vivid colors. So to me it just all comes down to what the actual image is as to the deciding factor between glossy / matte.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Couple of points. </p>

 

<ul>

<li>It depends what effect you want to create. Gloss prints tend to be more vibrant, this might be just right or might be too much depending on your taste and that of the people whose walls they'll hang on. </li>

<li>I would make a decision for each portfolio not each image. I think its important to show a consistency of approach if you're going to hang or show works together. </li>

<li>You are liable to get a slightly bigger dynamic range on gloss papers rather than matt. This can be useful .</li>

<li>The precise look and degree of gloss/reflectivity is a function of the paper you (or your lab) choose. For example Fuji "supergloss" has a real mirror finish and notably glossier than Crystal Archive gloss. Crystal archive papers look different from Endura papers and so on. Many labs don't offer much choice of papers because they want to use rolls, but another lab might have made different choices. And there's nothing particularly magical about Lambdas; a LightJet or Chromira will do similar jobs if the lab's good. </li>

<li>If you're making your own files and have the profiles of the papers your lab uses, you can use soft proofing to minimise the vibrancy differences between gloss and matt papers. </li>

</ul>

<p>The closest thing to a rule is that the artist decides . That means you need to get a test print or two made to help you develop a preference . </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...