steakandale Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 A while back, I picked up a picture book by Michael Green, titled: Patton's tank drive - D-day to Victory One prominent 3/4 length at-work portrait had a long description about his famous .45 Frontier revolvers and listed one of his famous quotes about them, but what I noticed, was around his neck. It looks like Leica in a leather half-case with a collapsible lens. About 7-8 photos in the book show him in the field and he has the camera at the ready in most of them, with the case open and no cap. Sorry - no scanner here to share with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank granovski Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 Re: "General Patton was a Leica-nut!" That explains it. ;*) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_w Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 While he was certainly not financially destitute, it was his wife who had the money. That explains it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank granovski Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 seeking perfection; that explains it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 German bodies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kievnut_den Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 yes, it is a rare "Heer" Leica II ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry_zet Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 stolen, 䨠liberated in germany Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonpg Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Yep, he certainly was a "nut" - but quite a brilliant one at that! In the movie, "Patton", in which George C Scott superbly became Patton's alter ego, I think the only time I saw him with a camera around his neck, seemed it looked like a Contax (Contarex), but I will certainly stand corrected if I'm wrong. Maybe the film producers also got it wrong - I've not seen the book by Green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry_hamlin Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Patton had considerable respect for things German. His personal firearms collection featured several Lugers and at least one 1896 Broomstick. It would have been in character for him to carry a Leica. His regard did not extend to German civic conformity or politics. He thought German soldiers to be extremely obedient and brave, but narrowly trained and inflexible. He was astonished at the lack of mechanical aptitude and deficiencies of encampment hygiene of most of the common German troops; an amazement shared by Montgomery and Eiesenhower. He theorized that the former was due to fewer appliances and automobiles among the general population, and the latter to much greater emphasis upon movement warfare rather than static defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Over a restaurant counter in Hatfield or Whately Mass. I saw a huge B&W blowup of Patton standing on a pontoon bridge peeing in the Rhine. And scowling at the photogtapher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 fyi the US Army did issue Leicas. In WWI the US reportedly paid Germany for violation of Mauser's bolt action rifle patent...don't know if we paid Barnack during WWII :-) Things aren't as simple as history books and "patriots" make them out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johns1 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 The American GI has never been slow in sizing up the "true value" in the countries we liberate. Even if Gen. Patton knew or cared nothing about cameras, it's only natural that sooner than later someone on his staff would alert to the Leica and push a clean one upstream as a way to suck up. That's how a military culture works, folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 I don't know about the US Army "issuing" Leicas. However, a do know that a sizeable number of German military Leicas were "expropriated" by GIs and brough home to the USA. These cameras and lenses were a major source of WWII military engraved Leica cameras and lenses, eg. the "Luftwaffen eigentum" (air force property) and "Heer" or Wermacht Heer (WH) [Army] Leicas. If you look in the cases that came with these cameras, often there is a pouch containing a card with the name and rank of the soldier that "liberated" the camera. I have a Luftwaffen Leica with a case that had a card containing the name of the US Army Colonel that brought the camera home. They were considered historical souvenirs by the soldiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 I believe US Army actually provided operational and repair manuals...I think they've been advertised on this site. That's my only evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Actually Patton was so high strung his doctors ordered him to find a hobby... so he took up photography. He ordered an underling on his staff to find him a camera that took great sharp pictures with exceptional bokeh and "glow". And then he added, "and don't bring back any of that digital crap either." ;>) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 BTW, I think I heard that story on the History Channel... or I made it up. I can't remember which. ;>) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 "I believe US Army actually provided operational and repair manuals...I think they've been advertised on this site. That's my only evidence." John is correct. The US Military bought a number of Leica cameras and lenses before and during the war (through third parties or neutral countries). The Army did issue Operations and Repair manuals. Amazingly, it was still possible to obtain new Leicas even after the Nazis ordered that the entire Leitz factory production go to the German war effort (which was around 1942, I believe). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 I forgot to mention, I didn't know that Patton carried a Leica, but I am not surprised. Patton had an appreciation of fine instruments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad_ Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Well, that certainly explains Patton liking pearl-handled pistols. www.citysnaps.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brad, didn't you see the movie? His pistols had ivory handles. Patton said something like "Only a two-bit pimp from a New Orleans whore-house would carry a pearl-handled pistol." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 "The General's Personal Sidearms" http://www.pattonhq.com/unknown/chap05.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
albert knapp md Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 A few historical errors to correct; 1. Patton himself was quite wealthy as his father had been a very successful businessman. He did marry into more money but he was not a poor boy. 2. The movie Patton is a whitewash written by a former member of Patton's staff. Do you know why Patton was relieved from command in Germany after the war? It wasn't for insulting hte Russians. Patton was given the boot because he refused to DENAZIFY southern Bavaria. In fact he put a fair number of Nazis back in power (many of whom were eventually arrested and sent to jail). He was warned to stop this practice but he continued and paid the price. 3. Patton was a vicious anti-semite who made life hell for his Jewish officers... Patton was a nut alright. BTW, Pattons hobbies were shooting, riding, playing polo and believe it or not sailing. He had a moderate sized yacht that he sailed on the east coast adn another that he used to sail to Hawaii in 1935 or so when he was stationed there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_penn Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 For Eliot: I have a pair of German binos I got from a Red Army vet in Tbilisi a few years ago. Old, wor, but very clear & sharp: marked, "E.Leitz - Wetzlar. They have army proof marks like found on various issue weapons. This the Leitz camera factory as converted to the war effort? Dave 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd thacker Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 At some point in the European war, word got to the US high command that too many of Patton's men were having their way with German women. High command put pressure on Patton to stop this practice, but Patton resisted, saying, "A man won't fight if he can't f_ck." Sunsequently, this quote was relayed to Roosevelt with the thought that the president would be outraged. On hearing these words, however, Roosevelt only responded, "Patton is a joy!" Joy though he may have been, Patton was also a sadist, a sociopath, and, as has been mentioned, a vicious anti-semite. (In all regards perhaps not unlike many of his current coevals.) Hence, no doubt, his famous statement at the end of the war that, "We've been fighting on the wrong Goddamn side!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd thacker Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Here's a quote from a speech Patton gave to his soldiers on the eve of D-Day (found at the "PattonHQ" site linked above). All the bad stuff I just mentioned notwithstanding, this speech shows, if nothing else, what an interesting and intense character he was. I'm sure many of his men appreciated that. "When a man is lying in a shell hole, if he just stays there all day, a German will get to him eventually. The hell with that idea. The hell with taking it. My men don't dig foxholes. I don't want them to. Foxholes only slow up an offensive. Keep moving. And don't give the enemy time to dig one either. We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the Germans that we've got more guts than they have; or ever will have. We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-bitches, we're going to rip out their living Goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun cocks_ckers by the bushel-f_cking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. When shells are hitting all around you and you wipe the dirt off your face and realize that instead of dirt it's the blood and guts of what once was your best friend beside you, you'll know what to do! "I don't want to get any messages saying, 'I am holding my position.' We are not holding a Goddamned thing. Let the Germans do that. We are advancing constantly and we are not interested in holding onto anything, except the enemy's balls. We are going to twist his balls and kick the living shi t out of him all of the time. Our basic plan of operation is to advance and to keep on advancing regardless of whether we have to go over, under, or through the enemy. We are going to go through him like crap through a goose; like shi t through a tin horn!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now