... a digital SLR from one of those evil companies. Seriously, I have a rangefinder with modern lenses -- 35/2 asph, 50/1.4 asph and 90/2.8 -- and a slr with optics from the 1970's up to 400mm w/ extension tubes for macro. The 70's lenses are good, but the M lenses are clearly better. My upcoming trip should involve good light, so I should be able to stop down to the optimum aperture with the R lenses, but my gut is telling me to go with the modern lenses. Part of this is because I've used rangefinders for 15 years and I'm very comfortable with the camera, but I've used the old SLR system for the last two trips. Trip #1 was fine, but trip #2 was a disaster for a variety of reasons. Does anybody have any thoughts on what I should do here?