joahnna_te Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Hi! I am thinking of getting a Nikon SLR fully manual camera. I was thinking either the Nikon FA or Nikon FM3A. Which of the two would you guys recommend? Thanks! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lachaine Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Absolutely, FM3a. It's the sweetest manual, non-electronified SLR on the market today. It works great in aperture priority too, and it has a modern TTL flash system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric friedemann Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_laepple Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 FM3A if it's ok for your budget. Maybe you need lenses too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
albert_smith Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Since you asked about the FA, it shows that you might not mind a used body. Like the others before me, I would choose the FM3a over the FA. If the price of a new FM3a is a problem, you can get about 95% of the features of the FM3a in a used FE2 for a lot lower of a price. The 5% that you don't get would basically be the mechanical shutter, but with good batteries, you would never notice the difference in practice. For what it is worth, I have been using a pair of FE2s since the mid-1980s, and they perform perfectly today after about two decades of hard use. I was happy when Nikon released the FM3a (an unexpected move in the AF / digital era), but when I contemplated buying one, it dawned on my that with two perfectly operating FE2s, there was no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Get a new FM3A. If you do not have enough, now, save up and buy it. Do not waste your money on FA. If it has problems, you will need to spend a lot of money to get it fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joahnna_te Posted February 17, 2005 Author Share Posted February 17, 2005 Thanks guys! Yep. I had second thoughts about the FA because the body would be used and aged already, while the FM3A would be squeaky new. Haha, yes, I've been saving up for it. Thanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnabdas Posted February 17, 2005 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Buy a good FM3A from KEH. You can't go wrong with these cameras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricardoyamamoto Posted February 18, 2005 Share Posted February 18, 2005 Just one thing- although I like the FM3A, its METER DISPLAY is hard to operate in LOW LIGHT conditions. And Auto mode doesn't solve the problem completely. If that bothers you, consider also the FM2n, which is a very Fully Manual Nikon SLR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeiffel Posted February 18, 2005 Share Posted February 18, 2005 I just got one too recently and am delighted with it.<br> Be prepared to shoot a lot more as it's so convenient to bring it everywhere (I mean compared to bigger AF bodies)...<br> At first I missed the spotmetering mode, but I'm now quickly getting used to CW.<br>Fred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin mayo Posted February 18, 2005 Share Posted February 18, 2005 The FM2n is also a good choice but check the viewfinder some people like the red diodes of the FM2 some like the needle/pointer of the Fe and Fm3a series. The FA has leds like the F3. Its some thing to think about before you make a decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted February 18, 2005 Share Posted February 18, 2005 Ditto everything Ricardo said. I prefer my FM2N because I do a lot of low light shooting and very little flash photography. The red plus-even-minus LEDs are very easy to see and quick to adjust, even for someone like me who was raised on match needle meter readouts. OTOH, I'm comfortable with quickly calculating flash. And on the third hand, if I did need to do a lot of flash photography I wouldn't sneeze at a camera with TTL flash capability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeiffel Posted February 18, 2005 Share Posted February 18, 2005 Not trying to discuss experimented users experiences, but dim light is not where I would want to rely solely on the FM3 metering.<br> I haven't yet had the opportunity to shoot in such low light situations with it though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted February 20, 2005 Share Posted February 20, 2005 I must be getting very old...I've always thought of both those cameras as electronic and not fully manual :-) FM3a, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartMoxham Posted February 22, 2005 Share Posted February 22, 2005 You have been given some good advice about the body so I will try to offer some advice about the lenses. One nice thing about the manual Nikons is their small size and light weight. They are really at their best with prime lenses and balance very well, a small selection of prime lenses is much better with these bodies in my opinion. I owned an FA after my EOS600 was stolen but kept for only 2 weeks before selling it to buy an EOS100. I tried to use the FA with a slow zoom and metz CT45 flash and it was a nightmare. The view finder was to dark to focus well and it did not balance well with the flash attached. The larger AF bodies balance much better with zooms and flashes. During the time I spent working as a cruiseship photographer there were FM and FM2 bodies supplied but there was the same problem while prime 50mm and 85mm lenses were also on board it was not possible to use these always because of space and requests for group shots. The use of large flashes and zooms meant that many of use would choose to use larger AF camera for reasons of better handling. So if you are thinking zoom lenses and large flashes you may be better off with a larger AF bodies as they will balance much better. The small manual bodies are a pleasure to use with small prime lenses and much easier and lighter to carry around than a large AF slr with a zoom but think carefully about what you want from a camera and what kind of lenses you will use and what kind of photography you will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now