Hello all, it's years since I posted here - happy to see my account still exists. Anyway, I am seriously considering purchasing a Fuji GFX 50R, and I am trying to decide which lens(es) I should go with. I've been shooting LF and Hasselblad V-series for the last fifteen years or so, so all prime lenses. And I've always understood that zoom lenses necessarily produce lower optical quality than primes. But the reality is that I don't really know HOW much difference there is, and whether it is going to be significant enough to justify the additional cost of going with multiple primes. So if I were to buy a GF 32-64 zoom, would there be a practical difference at 64mm compared to the 63mm prime? Grateful for any thoughts.